Questioning Centralizers: A Group Acting On Itself

  • Thread starter Thread starter 0rthodontist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a group theory problem involving centralizers and conjugates within a group G acting on itself by conjugation. The key conclusion is that the centralizers C(a) and C(b) are equal if and only if these centralizers are normal subgroups of G, provided that a and b are distinct conjugates. A counterexample was identified in the symmetric group S6, demonstrating the necessity of the distinctness condition. The professor clarified that the original problem lacked this specification, leading to confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically centralizers and conjugation.
  • Familiarity with normal subgroups and their properties.
  • Knowledge of symmetric groups, particularly S6.
  • Ability to analyze group actions and their implications.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of centralizers in group theory.
  • Research the structure and characteristics of symmetric groups, focusing on S6.
  • Explore the implications of group actions, particularly conjugation.
  • Learn about normal subgroups and their significance in group theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, group theorists, and anyone interested in the properties of centralizers and group actions.

0rthodontist
Science Advisor
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
0
This assignment has not yet been turned in, so I do not want any unfair help on this whatsoever. Please just give me a "yes" or a "no." Do not explain.

The question:
Let G be a group acting on itself by conjugation. Show that if a and b are conjugates in G, then the centralizers C(a) and C(b) are equal iff these centralizers are normal subgroups of G.

My problem:
I got the normal -> equal direction. But a is a conjugate of itself, and C(a) = C(a), so the other direction would imply that any centralizer is normal. I may be so tired I'm blind, but is this a flawed question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've handed the homework in. The professor said that the problem should have said that a and b are distinct.
 
The professor talked about this problem today: he had found a counterexample in S6 to the revised proposition stipulating that a and b are distinct. Apparently the other direction should have read something like "if a is in G, and for every b that is a conjugate of a, C(a) = C(b), then C(a) is normal in G."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K