Questions about 3 colliding object. Can i get some help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Botond
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving three colliding point-like objects in space, where two have mass m and one has mass 2m. Participants are trying to determine the distance covered and time elapsed until the objects collide, while grappling with the complexities of gravitational forces and initial conditions. There is a consensus that the heavier object will travel in a straight line, while the paths of the other two objects will likely be curved due to their interactions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding relative motion and the influence of gravitational forces on the trajectories. Overall, the participants are seeking clarity on the paths and collision dynamics of the three objects.
Botond
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Member warned about posting without the template and with no effort shown
The exercise is:

There are three point-like objects in space - far from any other objects - such that their initial velocities are zero, and the distance between any two is the same d. Two of the objects have the same mass of m, and the mass of the third one is 2m. Due to the gravitational force the objects begin to move and they collide with each other.

a) How much distance do they cover until they meet?

b) How much time elapses until the collision of the objects?

I tried to use F=ma, F=G*m1*m2*1/r2, and a=d2x/dt2 to get the time-distance function, but i could't do anything with the sin(alpha). The other problem is i can't find out the lane of the objects.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any sense of the KIND of paths each of the three would take? Can you draw a rough diagram of what the 3 paths would look like from start to collision?

Just as a side note, it is incorrect to say "such that their initial velocities are zero". To be correct, you have to say "such that their initial velocities are zero RELATIVE TO EACH OTHER". If you think this is just semantics, then you misunderstand the nature of motion.
 
phinds said:
Do you have any sense of the KIND of paths each of the three would take? Can you draw a rough diagram of what the 3 paths would look like from start to collision?

Just as a side note, it is incorrect to say "such that their initial velocities are zero". To be correct, you have to say "such that their initial velocities are zero RELATIVE TO EACH OTHER". If you think this is just semantics, then you misunderstand the nature of motion.
I know that the 2m mass will go straight, but i don't knoe the 2 other's path.
 
Botond said:
I know that the 2m mass will go straight, but i don't knoe the 2 other's path.
Yes, and that's a good start. Think about where they start out towards and where they end up at. That will tell you whether or not they go straight. Can you draw the initial force vectors? That will give you a good clue.
 
phinds said:
Yes, and that's a good start. Think about where they start out towards and where they end up at. That will tell you whether or not they go straight. Can you draw the initial force vectors? That will give you a good clue.
But i don't know where they will meet. And the forces aren't constant, so i think them flow can be curve.
 
Botond said:
But i don't know where they will meet. And the forces aren't constant, so i think them flow can be curve.
I agree. I think the heavy one travels in a straight line but the other two curve just a bit. I have not done any math to back this up so it could be wrong. I'm not sure what you point is about "the forces aren't constant". Of course they aren't constant, but that doesn't really seem to be the question, or to solve the issue of their trajectories. The point is that the heavy one is traveling along the line of motion of the center of gravity of the three (and so will continue in a straight line) but the other two are not and so, I think, will not stay on a straight line.

It may be that the center of gravity of the 3 bodies does not change as they move, in which case out belief about the two curved paths will be wrong. As I said, I haven't done any math on this.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top