Questions about magnetism and spin.

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaydnul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism Spin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between the spin of a planet and that of an electron, emphasizing that electrons are point-particles without physical dimensions, while planets have size and mass. Electron spin is a half-integer property that requires a 720° rotation for its wave function to match, unlike classical objects. The magnetic field generated by an electron's spin is analogous to that of a current loop, but this analogy has limitations as nothing is physically spinning. The intrinsic nature of electron spin arises from the Dirac equation, contrasting with planetary spin, which is influenced by external forces. The relationship between spin and magnetism remains complex and is rooted in quantum electrodynamics (QED).
jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
I just read a couple articles on angular momentum and spin... So what is the difference between the spin of a planet on its axis and the spin of an electron on its axis(because they both have angular momentum, right?) Also, if it is the spin of an electron that creates and determines magnetism, what is the physical explanation as to why a spinning static(well i guess formerly static) electric field causes a magnetic force?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just like spin of electron is similar to something spinning, but you shouldn't take it too literally, the magnetic field produced by spin is very much like that of a current loop, but again, you shouldn't take it too literally. There isn't anything actually spinning in there, so the analogy only goes so far.

The biggest difference between an electron and a planet is that electron is a point-particle. It has no dimension to it. In order for a ball to actually spin, it needs to have a size, and electron doesn't have it. The probability density of an electron can be distributed, but it still has the same spin at every point in space it can occupy.

The other part is the fact that the spin itself is half-integer. It quantizes the same way an orbital angular momentum would, but if there was an actual spinning object in there, it's wave function would not match itself after a 360° rotation. In fact, you need a 720° rotation for the wave function of electron to match itself in order for it to work as an actual rotation. And that actually manifests itself in the behavior of half-integer particles under permutation. If you switch any two electrons, the overall wave function changes sign. That's what results in different statistical behavior of fermions and bosons.

Mathematically, the electron's spin exists in a space spanned by SU(2) group. This has the feature described above. Because there exists a sort of 2:1 correspondence (a homomorphism, specifically) between SU(2) and SO(3), later describing rotations in 3D space, you effectively end up with spinors in SU(2) behaving like they are orientations in 3D space, but with "full rotation" being 720°.

It is not yet clear whether this actually corresponds to an SU(2) subspace of physical reality or just a mathematical curiosity caused by something else we don't understand. As far as why it causes magnetic field just like there is a current loop, I guess I can point to QED Lagrangian and say, "It follows from that," but it's probably not a satisfactory answer. Unfortunately, I can't really do better.
 
lundyjb said:
if it is the spin of an electron that creates and determines magnetism, what is the physical explanation as to why a spinning static(well i guess formerly static) electric field causes a magnetic force?
Not sure what you mean here,Spin of the electron is a natural consequence of dirac eqn.Spin of the electron interacts with magnetic field which can be described by minimal coupling in Dirac eqn.
 
Spin is an intrinsic form of angular momentum, meaning that it is an inherently unique property of the given electron. Unlike the spin of an electron, the spin of the planet on its axis is caused by an external force.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top