Questions about matrices and vectors:Why does the dot product of

okkvlt
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Questions about matrices and vectors:


Why does the dot product of a and b equal |a||b|cos(angle between a and b)

are the vectors of a matrix the columns or the rows, or can it be either?

I know a 0 determinant of a matrix means the vectors lie on top of each other, and the absolute value of a determinant is the area of the shape formed by a,b, and a+b, but what is the geometrical meaning of a negative versus a positive determinant?

Seing as the dot product of vectors has a geometrical interperetation, I am wondering what is the geometrical interperetation of matrix multiplication.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


okkvlt said:
Questions about matrices and vectors:


Why does the dot product of a and b equal |a||b|cos(angle between a and b)

are the vectors of a matrix the columns or the rows, or can it be either?

I know a 0 determinant of a matrix means the vectors lie on top of each other, and the absolute value of a determinant is the area of the shape formed by a,b, and a+b, but what is the geometrical meaning of a negative versus a positive determinant?

Seing as the dot product of vectors has a geometrical interperetation, I am wondering what is the geometrical interperetation of matrix multiplication.

Try looking at cases where the determinant is positive and those negative. After about 3 examples, you might get an idea.

Or look at the equation |a||b|cos(angle ab), when is it negative? It is negative when cos is negative, and when is that?
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top