Questions About Satellites Orbiting Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrsvonnegut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Satellites
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy required to launch a 250 kg satellite into orbit at an altitude of 4.0 x 10^6 m, including the potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE) needed for orbital velocity. The initial calculations for PE were shared, with a focus on the gravitational force and the distinction between altitude and orbital radius. Participants discussed using gravitational formulas and Kepler's laws to determine the satellite's orbital period and the additional energy needed for a geosynchronous orbit. Clarifications were made regarding the use of angular velocity and the relationship between velocity and radius in circular motion. The conversation concluded with a consensus on the steps needed to calculate the total energy required for the satellite's launch and orbit.
mrsvonnegut
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a satellite with a mass of 250 kg, which I'm launching from Earth. This neglects air resistance/rotation of the planet etc.
  • a. How much energy is needed to put the satellite in orbit at an altitude of 4.0 x 106 m?
  • b. What would be the period of the satellite at that altitude?
  • c. How much additional energy would be needed to put the satellite into a geosynchronous orbit?

Homework Equations


Period=2pir/T
PE=G(mM/r)
KE=(1/2)(m)(v^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


This is my first day doing orbital problems, so I'm really having trouble getting started! For a, I thought maybe I should calculate velocity then the kinetic energy using 1/2mv^2? And then add it to the potential energy of the satellite when it's orbiting, using PE=mgh?For b, I know a formula to find the period. For c, I've never seen a problem like that, but I assume I would put 24 hours into the period equation and start from there? Thank you in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part a, you just need to get the PE from the surface of the Earth to that altitude.
 
Okay! I did:
PEi=G([(250 kg)(5.97 x 10^24 kg)]/[6378100 m])
PEf=G([(250 kg)(5.97 x 10^24 kg)]/[6378100 m + 4.0 x 10^6 m])
The difference between the two was 6007709504 J.
(5.97 x 10^24 kg is what I used as the mass of the earth, and 6378100 m is what I used as the radius of the earth).
Does that look okay?
 
mrsvonnegut said:
Okay! I did:
PEi=G([(250 kg)(5.97 x 10^24 kg)]/[6378100 m])
PEf=G([(250 kg)(5.97 x 10^24 kg)]/[6378100 m + 4.0 x 10^6 m])
The difference between the two was 6007709504 J.
(5.97 x 10^24 kg is what I used as the mass of the earth, and 6378100 m is what I used as the radius of the earth).
Does that look okay?

I think that should be correct.

For the second part, use the fact that gravitation force of attraction between the Earth and the satellite = centripetal force on the satellite to get the period.
 
Question for pondering: Do you want to take into account the fact that the satellite, when it's sitting on the launching pad, already has a speed around the Earth's center due to the rotation of the Earth?
 
gneill said:
Question for pondering: Do you want to take into account the fact that the satellite, when it's sitting on the launching pad, already has a speed around the Earth's center due to the rotation of the Earth?

Nope! My teacher said we're not considering it.
 
Okay, you've worked out the energy that you have to supply in order to climb to the appropriate height above the Earth, now you need to impart an orbital velocity (KE) in order that it can stay there. What's the required velocity for a circular orbit at a given orbital radius r?
 
I'm not sure how to show the gravitational force between Earth and the satellite--should I use mg?

Also, one of my friends told me just to calculate the PE of the satellite above Earth as PE=G([250 kg)(5.97 x 10^24)]/(4.0 x 10^6]), which gives a total of 24887437.5 J, which is a different answer. How can I tell which is right?
 
mg = m(v^2/r), but should I use regular gravity?
 
  • #10
mrsvonnegut said:
I'm not sure how to show the gravitational force between Earth and the satellite--should I use mg?

Also, one of my friends told me just to calculate the PE of the satellite above Earth as PE=G([250 kg)(5.97 x 10^24)]/(4.0 x 10^6]), which gives a total of 24887437.5 J, which is a different answer. How can I tell which is right?

Your friend is confused about the distinction between altitude (above Earth's surface) and orbital radius (around Earth's center).
 
  • #11
mrsvonnegut said:
mg = m(v^2/r), but should I use regular gravity?

'mg' only applies near the Earth's surface. Use the full Newtonian gravitation formula for the force (and the PE).
 
  • #12
GmM/d^2 = m(v^2/r)?
 
  • #13
*r^2
 
  • #14
mrsvonnegut said:
GmM/d^2 = m(v^2/r)?

In this case d is the same as r, so you can get v which will help you to get ω.

Your first equation in the relevant equations should be

T = 2π/ω
 
  • #15
What is ω? I don't think I've learned it yet. Is it a symbol?
 
  • #16
mrsvonnegut said:
What is ω? I don't think I've learned it yet. Is it a symbol?

Angular velocity which is found in circular motion. It has a simple relation to v and r.
 
  • #17
Oh--we haven't done that in my class! Is there a way to avoid it?
 
  • #18
mrsvonnegut said:
Oh--we haven't done that in my class! Is there a way to avoid it?

Well usually when you learn circular motion and centripetal force (mv2/r), you would learn about angular velocity and how it relates to velocity and radius.

Are you given the formula for kepler's third law where T2∝r3 ?
 
  • #19
Yes, I do have that!
 
  • #20
mrsvonnegut said:
Yes, I do have that!

ah in that case you can rewrite T2∝r3 as T2=Kr3, your notes should have what is needed to calculate the constant K.
 
  • #21
rock.freak667 said:
ah in that case you can rewrite T2∝r3 as T2=Kr3, your notes should have what is needed to calculate the constant K.

My teacher provides a way to find the period when I have the velocity, which I know from our earlier work! So for part c, should I substitute Earth's period, then find the new velocity, then find the new KE, and find the difference between the KE's?
 
  • #22
mrsvonnegut said:
My teacher provides a way to find the period when I have the velocity, which I know from our earlier work!

Oh in that case, then find 'v' using the earlier way.

mrsvonnegut said:
So for part c, should I substitute Earth's period, then find the new velocity, then find the new KE, and find the difference between the KE's?

I think once you find the KE, you would add that to the PE to get the total energy required. The PE you calculated before is how much energy is required just to get it at that height.
 
  • #23
Got it--so the KE of the v of Earth's period (to move it upward), plus my earlier work to put it in orbit. THANK YOU SO MUCH! You were so helpful and patient!
 
Back
Top