Questions about Wardenclyffe Tower and it's plausibility

  • Thread starter Thread starter TeslaFan51
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tower
AI Thread Summary
Wardenclyffe Tower, designed by Nikola Tesla, aimed to transmit wireless electricity over long distances, with expectations of covering a 30-mile radius. The feasibility of creating a global network for free wireless electricity is debated, with some viewing Tesla's ideas as overly ambitious or impractical. Critics question the notion of "free" electricity, emphasizing the costs associated with construction and maintenance. Supporters argue that Tesla's vision, despite its challenges, reflects a significant scientific endeavor that could be revisited with modern technology. The discussion highlights both skepticism and admiration for Tesla's innovative spirit and the potential for future advancements in wireless energy transmission.
TeslaFan51
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Questions about Wardenclyffe Tower and it's plausibility...

Hello! I have always been fascinated by Nikola Tesla (who hasn't? :)) and other rare birds that share such innovation.

I know the history of wireless electricity and that it is possible, and I know about Wardenclyffe Tower.

I am however, NOT electrically inclined or educated. I understand that electricity is just energy and that the tower was just a form of amplifying such energy across great distances... yes?
From what I understand, the tower was tested and expected to provide electricity in a 30 mile radius, is this correct?

My question is: Do you think it is possible, as Tesla believed, to have a world wide network of free wireless electricity? Do you think with today's technology such towers could be produced... perhaps on smaller scales but with greater output?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


TeslaFan51 said:
Hello! I have always been fascinated by Nikola Tesla (who hasn't? :)) and other rare birds that share such innovation.

I know the history of wireless electricity and that it is possible, and I know about Wardenclyffe Tower.

I am however, NOT electrically inclined or educated. I understand that electricity is just energy and that the tower was just a form of amplifying such energy across great distances... yes?
From what I understand, the tower was tested and expected to provide electricity in a 30 mile radius, is this correct?

My question is: Do you think it is possible, as Tesla believed, to have a world wide network of free wireless electricity? Do you think with today's technology such towers could be produced... perhaps on smaller scales but with greater output?

Thanks!

Welcome to the PF.

Tesla had a lot of crackpot ideas, and this looks to be one of them:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wardenclyffe_Tower

And even if it were possible to transmit useful levels of energy safely over some distance wirelessly, why do you think it would be "free"?
 


Well. Electricity is just energy yes? No matter if it takes the form of heat, motion, whatever.

Wardenclyffe tower, unless I'm mistaken was intended to have 'roots' that went about 300ft into the Earth- that is certainly deep enough to experience geothermal energy... and the deeper you go the hotter things get.

I guess I don't see what, beyond the construction of the tower, would require monetary support? But then, I don't know how such a thing would work :)... I'm basing this mostly on my understanding of using wind and water energy in combination with an alternator/magnets to form electrical current.

Can't say I consider it a crackpot idea, Tesla seemed to have a pretty decent reputation of producing what he claimed was possible.

On the very subject of this tower he wrote:
"It is not a dream, it is a simple feat of scientific electrical engineering, only expensive — blind, faint-hearted, doubting world! [...] Humanity is not yet sufficiently advanced to be willingly led by the discoverer's keen searching sense. But who knows? Perhaps it is better in this present world of ours that a revolutionary idea or invention instead of being helped and patted, be hampered and ill-treated in its adolescence — by want of means, by selfish interest, pedantry, stupidity and ignorance; that it be attacked and stifled; that it pass through bitter trials and tribulations, through the strife of commercial existence. So do we get our light. So all that was great in the past was ridiculed, condemned, combatted, suppressed — only to emerge all the more powerfully, all the more triumphantly from the struggle." – Nikola Tesla

Just looking for opinions and information,
Thanks! :)
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top