Questions About Work, Force, and Pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter mprm86
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Applying a force to an object for an instant does constitute work, as work is done during the time the force is applied, resulting in the object's acceleration. A constant force can maintain an object's constant speed only when it is balanced by opposing forces, such as friction, which leads to a net force of zero. According to Newton's second law, an object subjected to a single force will accelerate, contradicting the idea that it can move at constant speed without additional forces acting on it. The claim that a pendulum pushed with just the right force will take an infinite time to reach its maximum height is incorrect; it will reach that height in an instant if the force is perfectly matched. Overall, understanding the interplay of forces and motion is crucial in physics.
mprm86
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
1. If you apply a force to an object only for just and instant, for examples, if you hit a ball with a force of 10 N and it moves 100 meters, are you making work?

2. How can a constant force that is applied to an object during a period of time can make it move with constant speed? According to Newtons second law, F=ma, so the object should accelerate.

3. My teacher says that if we push a pendulum with the exact force it requires to reach its maximum high, the time it will take to reach that point will be infinite. How can this be possible?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2. If the force you apply is balanced by another force, the object can move at constant speed. Think about pushing a block with constant force; if the force you apply is opposed by friction in the opposite direction then a constant speed can be achieved. Newton's second law refers to the net (overall) force acting on the object.
 
Work only happens while the force is being applied. After the force is done, no work is being done.

2. It can't. If a single force is being applied to an object, that object will accelerate according to his second law. Only in the presence of more than one force will variation of this law occur, in which case the principles of superposition will give you the net force.

3. This is not true. If its the exact force required to reach that point, it will reach that point for an infinitely short amount of time and leave. If you were JUST shy of the exact force, it would not reach the point at all. What he said is like saying if you tried to jump up to the moon it will take you an infinite amount of time to get there.
 
1. If you apply a force to an object only for just and instant, for examples, if you hit a ball with a force of 10 N and it moves 100 meters, are you making work?

i was. no one can hit a ball instantly - it always takes some certain time, during which i apply a force and the ball accellerates. The work one makes can be approximated as the kinetic energy of a ball just after the hit.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top