Questions on forces and coefficients

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of friction in a physics lab using a horizontal pulley system. The user calculated the force of friction and the normal force based on weights measured in grams, leading to a coefficient of friction of 0.16. However, a key correction was noted regarding the unit conversion from grams to kilograms, emphasizing that force should be calculated in Newtons. The method used for the calculation was validated, with a suggestion to simplify the process by using ratios instead of converting units. Overall, the calculations were confirmed to be correct with minor adjustments needed for unit consistency.
Kingbaldur
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Hello, this is my first time posting, I've run into a bit of a snag in my physics lab. I am to figure out the coefficient of friction based on the values we found in the lab. Now I found them out however I just want to be sure that I am doing this right. these values were determined using a simple,horizontal pulley system that ran off the end of a table



Homework Equations



F=MA
coefficient of friction= Force of friction/force normal

The Attempt at a Solution


So I have the weight on the table at 1,045g and the weight required to pull this weight towards the end of the table was 170g.
I figured the force of friction was the mass of the pulley (170g) X the acceleration of Gravity, so F=170g X 9.8 m/s squared which came out to be 1666N

Now the force normal i figured to be the same way. The weight on top of the table was 1,045g X 9.8m/s squared which came out to be 10241N

so now I have the force of friction to be 1666N and the force normal to be 10241N
I then used the coefficient of friction equation, 1666N/10241N which came out to be .16

So after all that my coefficient of friction was .16
Could anyone please tell me if I am doing this right? I believe I am but would like to be sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Newton is a kg*m/s^2, not a g*m/s^2. So the gravity on the weight wouldn't be 1045g*9.8 m/s; it would be 1.045 kg *9.8 m/s. Otherwise, your work is right.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Kingbaldur! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(I take it that the table and the string are both exactly horizontal, and that you're measuring the coefficient of static friction?)

Yes, your method is correct, but you could just have left g as g (instead of multiplying by 9.8 twice), and said 170g/1045g = .16 :wink:
 
Hmm, I see, well thanks to both of you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top