Questions on Neutrinos: Mass, OPERA & More

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlfreCabo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrinos
AI Thread Summary
Neutrinos do have mass, as established in the last 10-15 years, contradicting earlier beliefs that they were massless. This mass is crucial for understanding neutrino mixing, which would be impossible without it. Neutrinos can pass through matter, as demonstrated in the OPERA experiment, because they interact only via the weak force, unlike photons that are affected by electromagnetic forces. The weak force's interactions are extremely limited, allowing neutrinos to travel through dense materials without significant obstruction. The discussion emphasizes the evolving understanding of neutrinos and their properties in modern physics.
AlfreCabo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have some questions regarding the recent neutrino´s theories:

1. Neutrinos have or don't have mass? I have heard both postures.
2. I have read that reason for neutrinos go through matter (like in the OPERA experiment from CERN to Grand Sasso) is because they don't have mass. Photons also don't have mass, so why light is stopped by mass such as a wall?
3. << overly speculative topic question deleted by Mentor >>

Thanks!

Alfredo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Wondering same questions!
 
AlfreCabo said:
I have some questions regarding the recent neutrino´s theories:

1. Neutrinos have or don't have mass? I have heard both postures.
2. I have read that reason for neutrinos go through matter (like in the OPERA experiment from CERN to Grand Sasso) is because they don't have mass. Photons also don't have mass, so why light is stopped by mass such as a wall?
<< overly speculative topic question deleted by Mentor >>
Thanks!

Alfredo

Your 3rd question involved an overly-speculative topic, so it was deleted. We don't engage in overly speculative discussions at the PF. (Please see the Rules link at the top of the page).

On your questions about neutrino characteristics, this page may help to answer some of your questions:

http://www.ps.uci.edu/~superk/neutrino.html

.
 
At least two of the three neutrino states must have mass. Otherwise, the neutrino mixings we observe would be impossible.

The reason that neutrinos interact so weakly is simply because they are unaffected by either the electromagnetic force or the strong force (which holds together the quarks in protons and neutrons). All of their interactions are through the weak force which, as it's name suggests, is really quite weak. In fact, it's so weak that particles typically need to get within about 10^{-17} meters to feel it. For comparison, the radius of a proton is almost 10^{-15} meters.
 
AlfreCabo said:
1. Neutrinos have or don't have mass? I have heard both postures.

You've heard (or read) both postures because the existence of neutrino mass was established only fairly recently, during the last 10-15 years. Before that, physicists generally assumed that neutrinos had zero mass, in the lack of evidence to the contrary, while of course continuing to search for definitive evidence one one way or the other. Old books, articles, Web sites, etc. contain outdated information.
 
AlfreCabo said:
1. Neutrinos have or don't have mass? I have heard both postures.

They have mass. Books that say otherwise have outdated information since this was only established in 1998.

2. I have read that reason for neutrinos go through matter (like in the OPERA experiment from CERN to Grand Sasso) is because they don't have mass. Photons also don't have mass, so why light is stopped by mass such as a wall?

That's incorrect. The reason neutrinos go through everything is that they don't interact via the strong nuclear force or electromagnetism. They only thing that affects neutrinos is the weak force, and the weak force is weak...
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top