Questions regarding exotic weaponry based in the new physics .

  • Thread starter Thread starter Max Faust
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an article from Pravda suggesting research into a new generation of nuclear weaponry based on "the new physics." Participants express skepticism about the article's credibility, labeling much of it as potentially nonsensical while acknowledging some elements may have a basis in reality. Specifically, the concept of a gamma amplifier related to hafnium-178 isomer is mentioned as a theoretical possibility, though its practical application remains uncertain. References to academic sources highlight ongoing debates and experimental challenges surrounding this topic. Overall, the conversation reflects a mix of curiosity and caution regarding claims of advanced weaponry research.
Max Faust
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Questions regarding exotic weaponry based in "the new physics".

http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/12737_weapons.html"

I stumbled upon a strange article in Pravda.

I would be grateful if anyone with some real insight into these issues would comment on the content of this article, which seems to suggest that "a new generation" of nuclear weaponry is currently being researched.

Is this by and large BS or does the author of this article make sense?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Max Faust said:
http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/12737_weapons.html"

I stumbled upon a strange article in Pravda.

I would be grateful if anyone with some real insight into these issues would comment on the content of this article, which seems to suggest that "a new generation" of nuclear weaponry is currently being researched.

Is this by and large BS or does the author of this article make sense?

Of course, as with any conspiration, if it is sufficiently secret, it will appear as BS. Any statement based upon a hypothesis of sufficient secrecy is non-falsifiable.

My guess is that most of what is written there is essentially crackpot rubbish (but then, who knows :shy: ), with some small elements of truth in there. The gamma amplifier is indeed a hypothetical possibility based upon a possibly genuine physical effect (but which has nothing to do with false vacuums, dark energy or whatever).

It has to do with stimulated emission of gamma rays from a hafnium-178 isomer.

There is a wiki entry on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_gamma_emission:_Hafnium_controversy

but I don't know myself how reliable that Wiki is, so don't take it as a peer-reviewed source, but it can be a starting point for eventual investigations if you're interested.

There has been some theoretical difficulty with it:
http://prc.aps.org/abstract/PRC/v71/i2/e024606

Also, experimentally, things aren't that clear:
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v87/i7/e072503

I'm no expert on it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top