Questions regarding relativistic momentum

nos
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I found a derivation for relativistic momentum on this page:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special_Relativity/Dynamics

I understand it all the way through, except the point where they have come to this equation.

m_{red} =\frac{m_{blue}}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{u(x,r)}{c})^{2}}}

Where(as I understand correctly) mblue is the mass according to the frame moving at the same x-velocity as the blue ball and where mred is the mass of the red ball according to the frame moving with the same x-velocity as the blue ball.

Then they go to:

M =\frac{m_{0}}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{u}{c})^{2}}}

Where u is now the relative velocity of the red ball for the moving frame.
But that is what I don't understand. How can they suddenly ignore the relativistic effects of the y-velocities? The first equation gives the mass of red ball in terms of the relative x-velocity of the red ball. Then how do they get to relativistic mass in terms of the relative velocity u? Because ux,red is only the x component velocity and ured has both a x-component and y-component.

This is my hypothesis:

They let both uy,red and uy, blue approach zero. So that the mass of the blue ball will correspond to the rest mass and that the relativistic effects of the y-velocities will cancel.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top