Quick doubt about linear application and its matrix

Felafel
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let ##f:\mathbb{R}^3\to \mathbb{R}^3## such that ##v_1=(1,0,1) , v_2=(0,1,-1), v_3=(0,0,2)## and ##f(v_1)=(3,1,0), f(v_2)=(-1,0,2), f(v_3)=(0,2,0)##
find ##M^{E,E}_f## where ##E=(e_1,e_2,e_3)## is the canonical basis.


The Attempt at a Solution


i see
##v_1=e_1+e_3##
##v_2=e_2-e_3##
##v_3=2e_3##
thus
##f(e_1)+f(e_3)=(3,1,0)##
##f(e_2)-f(e_3)=(-1, 0 ,2)##
##2f(e_3)=(0,2,0)##
solving the system i get
##f(e_3)=(0,1,0)##
##f(e_1)=(3,0,0)##
##f(e_2)=(-1,1,2)##

and so I thought the matrix was:

(3 -1 0)
(0 1 1)
(0 2 0)

but according to my book the solution should be:
(3 0 0)
(-1 1 2)
(0 1 0)

why? shouldn't the image of the vector form the columns instead of the rows?
thank you in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Felafel said:

Homework Statement


Let ##f:\mathbb{R}^3\to \mathbb{R}^3## such that ##v_1=(1,0,1) , v_2=(0,1,-1), v_3=(0,0,2)## and ##f(v_1)=(3,1,0), f(v_2)=(-1,0,2), f(v_3)=(0,2,0)##
find ##M^{E,E}_f## where ##E=(e_1,e_2,e_3)## is the canonical basis.


The Attempt at a Solution


i see
##v_1=e_1+e_3##
##v_2=e_2-e_3##
##v_3=2e_3##
thus
##f(e_1)+f(e_3)=(3,1,0)##
##f(e_2)-f(e_3)=(-1, 0 ,2)##
##2f(e_3)=(0,2,0)##
solving the system i get
##f(e_3)=(0,1,0)##
##f(e_1)=(3,0,0)##
##f(e_2)=(-1,1,2)##

and so I thought the matrix was:

(3 -1 0)
(0 1 1)
(0 2 0)

but according to my book the solution should be:
(3 0 0)
(-1 1 2)
(0 1 0)

why? shouldn't the image of the vector form the columns instead of the rows?
thank you in advance :)

Your answer looks right assuming the vectors are column vectors. Perhaps the book is treating them as row vectors and multiplying the matrix on the right?
 
i don't see why it would do that though.
it's just wrong, probably
thank you :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top