Quick question about identity elements

  • Thread starter Thread starter Salamon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Identity
Salamon
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I saw this question in an abstract algebra text that I was reading.

"Is it true that (w − x) − (y − z) = (w − y) − (x − z) is an identity for real numbers?
Can you say why or why not?"

I know that an identity element does not change the value of a real number. So 0 is the identity element for addition and 1 is the identity element for multiplication.

But how can an equation be an identity element?

I mean I see that (w-x)-(y-z) = (w-y)-(x-z) is a true statement. But unless you know the values of w,x,y,and z, how can you see whether it will be an identity element for real numbers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You misunderstand the statement. It calls the equation an identity, meaning that it holds for all real values of x, y, z, and w. It has nothing to do with the identity element (0) as such.
 
thanks
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top