tjackson3
- 140
- 0
This is something that has been bothering me for awhile. Suppose we have some function f(x) = u(x) + iv(x), where u,v are real-valued functions. Obviously Re(f) = u(x) and Im(f) = v(x), both of which are real. My question is: in general, is it safe to say that
\frac{d}{dx} Re(f) = Re\left(\frac{df}{dx}\right)
? If so, that makes life a lot easier with trig identities dealing with derivatives. This seems really trivial, and I feel like it's correct, but I can't figure out how one would prove it, and I don't want to use it just assuming that it is true...
Thanks!
\frac{d}{dx} Re(f) = Re\left(\frac{df}{dx}\right)
? If so, that makes life a lot easier with trig identities dealing with derivatives. This seems really trivial, and I feel like it's correct, but I can't figure out how one would prove it, and I don't want to use it just assuming that it is true...
Thanks!