Earth's Elliptical Path: Acceleration Direction Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipse
AI Thread Summary
The Earth follows an elliptical orbit with the sun at one focus, raising questions about the direction of its acceleration. While initial calculations suggested that acceleration points toward the center of the ellipse, the gravitational force from the sun indicates it should actually be directed toward the sun. Acknowledgment of incorrect parameterization highlights that the speed of the Earth varies, being faster at perihelion than at aphelion. The discussion also shifts to a general case of particle motion, emphasizing the importance of analyzing second derivatives to determine acceleration direction. Ultimately, the acceleration of the Earth is indeed directed toward the sun due to gravitational influence.
alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Earth travels in an elliptical path with the sun at one of its foci. Is the acceleration of the Earth directed towards the sun or towards the centre of the ellipse?



Homework Equations


The Earth's elliptical path can be parametrized as:
x=acos (pt)
y=bsin (pt)

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the above parametrizations and differentiating twice, I get that the Earth's acceleration is directed towards the centre of the ellipse.

However the force on the Earth is due to the sun, and so I feel the Earth's acceleration must be directed towards the sun.

Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alexmahone said:
However the force on the Earth is due to the sun, and so I feel the Earth's acceleration must be directed towards the sun.

That's correct.

EDIT: you're paramaterization is incorrect if "t" is really the time. It implies the speed is the same at aphelion and perihelion, but in reality it is faster at perihelion.
 
Redbelly98 said:
That's correct.

EDIT: you're paramaterization is incorrect if "t" is really the time. It implies the speed is the same at aphelion and perihelion, but in reality it is faster at perihelion.

Thanks, Redbelly98! :)

Forget the Earth - sun example.

What if the x and y coordinates of a particle were given by the parametrization where t is time? Where would the acceleration of the particle be directed towards?
 
That's a reasonable question. Well, you can take the 2nd derivative of both x and y with respect to t, and see what direction the vector
a = (d2x/dt2, d2y/dt2)
points in.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top