Quick question on orbital eccentricity and mechanical energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting the formula related to orbital eccentricity (e) in the context of a planet's orbit around the Sun. It emphasizes that e is influenced by the specific mechanical energy and angular momentum of the orbiting body. The participants highlight the importance of understanding the symbols in the formula, such as specific orbital energy and the standard gravitational parameter. Clarification is requested regarding the context of the formula and its components. Overall, the conversation seeks to deepen the understanding of how these factors interact in orbital mechanics.
Contadoren11
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm really at a loss: How should this formula be interpreted? Is e simply dependent on the specific mechanical energy of, say, a planet in orbit around the Sun as well as its angular momentum?

52dc105647c497f0c83b12338f0974bd.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You need to provide some context. Where it's from and what the symbols mean.
 
Contadoren11 said:
Hi

I'm really at a loss: How should this formula be interpreted? Is e simply dependent on the specific mechanical energy of, say, a planet in orbit around the Sun as well as its angular momentum?

52dc105647c497f0c83b12338f0974bd.png

I'd say the answer to your question is "yes", but I think you're looking for more than that. Maybe you should elaborate.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top