Quick question regarding tangential acceleration

AI Thread Summary
Tangential acceleration is caused by forces acting along the path of an object's motion, such as propulsion from a jet engine or rowing. It indeed increases the object's linear velocity as it acts parallel to the direction of motion. Torque plays a crucial role in generating tangential acceleration, as increased torque leads to greater acceleration. The relationship between tangential acceleration and angular acceleration is defined by the equation: tangential acceleration equals the radius multiplied by angular acceleration. Understanding these concepts clarifies how forces affect the motion of rotating objects.
ace123
Messages
250
Reaction score
0
What is the force that is responsible for the tangential acceleration? And how does this acceeleration work. I mean this must increase the object's linear velocity right? Since it acts parallel to it. Can someone help clarify this for me.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ace123 said:
What is the force that is responsible for the tangential acceleration? And how does this acceeleration work. I mean this must increase the object's linear velocity right? Since it acts parallel to it. Can someone help clarify this for me.

Thanks
What you say is correct. However, the force could by anything that acts along the path of the object, such as a jet engine or the oars of a rowboat.
 
I think torque is responsible for tangential acceleration. Increased torque will increase tangential acceleration.
 
So would any object that is rotating experience a tangential acceleration? Or does it need a force to be applied like in an example of a bicycle wheel?
 
Mr Noblet said:
I think torque is responsible for tangential acceleration. Increased torque will increase tangential acceleration.

Torque is equal to the perpendicular force times the distance r from the axis of rotation to the point of application of the force. I believe you got tangential acceleration confused with angular acceleration.

Or maybe I'am wrong.:smile:

Edit: Yes I'am wrong because I just read that tangential acceleration = r times angular acceleration.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top