Quick SUVAT Check: Find Time for Particles P & Q to Become Level

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taylor_1989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Suvat
AI Thread Summary
Particle P is fired upwards at 17.64 m/s, reaching maximum height before particle Q is launched at 25 m/s after a delay of 1.8 seconds. The user correctly applies the SUVAT equations to find the time when both particles are level, setting the equations for their respective displacements equal. They clarify their reasoning for using T=T and T=T-1.8, acknowledging the unknown time for P to reach maximum height. The final answer of 2.44 seconds confirms their understanding of the problem. The discussion concludes with validation of their intuition and approach.
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14
I would just like someone to give a quick check to part b) of this question, just to make sure I have fully grasped the concept.

A t=0s, particle P is fired vertically upwards with speed 17.64ms-1.When P reaches its maximum height, particle Q is fired vertically upwards with a speed 25ms-1. Both particles are fired from ground level.

a) find the time between the two particles being fired.
Ans:1.8s

b) Find the length of the time after P is fired before the two particles become level.

So I start with the SUVAT equation:

S=Sp, U=17.64, V=0, T=T
S=Sq, U=25, V=N/A, T=T-1.8

I then use the equation S=ut+\frac{1}{2}at^2

I would the set Sp=Sq, and solve simultaneously.

My point I would like to touch on is the t part. I set T=T because I do not know the total time take for the ball to reach maximum height; correct? T=T-1.8, because once again I do not know 1. the time taken for the ball to reach max height 2. - 1.8 because it was fired 1.8s later than the first.

I did end up with the right ans which is t=2.44s. But just want to makes sure I have the right intuition behind the question.

Big thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taylor_1989 said:
I did end up with the right ans which is t=2.44s. But just want to makes sure I have the right intuition behind the question.
Yes you do. Good job.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top