Solve SUVAT Inconsistency: Find Time & Velocity of Ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcairtime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Suvat
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball projected vertically downwards from a height of 80 m with an initial velocity of 4 m/s. The discussion focuses on finding the final velocity and the time taken for the ball to reach the ground, using various kinematic equations while considering the direction of acceleration due to gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different kinematic equations, including v^2 = u^2 + 2as and s = ut + 0.5at^2, to find time and velocity. There are questions about the sign conventions used for acceleration and initial velocity, as well as the presence of multiple solutions for time.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the use of kinematic equations and the implications of sign conventions. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations of the equations, and some participants express confusion about the results obtained from different approaches.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential misunderstandings regarding the application of kinematic equations and the treatment of positive and negative directions in the context of the problem. Participants are encouraged to clarify their assumptions and the setup of the equations used.

mcairtime
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Hi there,

Sorry in advance. This problem is very simple but I can't see where I'm going wrong or what I'm missing. It may even be a numerical mistake, although I have run the numbers a few times. I have a feeling that I'm going to kick myself but anyway...

A ball is projected vertically downwards at 4 m/s from the top of a tower 80 m high. Find a) the velocity of the ball as it hits the ground and b) the time it takes to reach the ground.

(Taking down to be the positive direction and using g = 9.8)

a) use v^2 = u^2 +2as to find v = 12*sqrt(11) m/s or roughly 39.8 m/s (having discarded the negative solution).

b) use t = (v-u)/a to find t = (60*sqrt(11) - 20)/49 or approx 3.65 s

All fine, all easy.

Now, doing the problem again but using s = ut +0.5at^2 I get two solutions for t, one positive (matching the solution above) and a negative solution which may be discarded. All fine still.

When I try using s = vt - 0.5at^2 I get two solutions namely t = (60*sqrt(11) - 20)/49 i.e. matching the solution above but my second solution is t = (60*sqrt(11) + 20)/49 or roughly 4.47 s.

Why am I coming out with a second positive solution? I'll put my working below in case it's an arithmetic error:

s = vt - 0.5at^2

80 = 12*sqrt(11)t - (0.5)(9.8)t^2

4.9t^2 - 12*sqrt(11)t +80 = 0

t = (12*sqrt(11) +/- sqrt((12*sqrt(11))^2 - (4)(4.9)(80)))/9.8

t = (12*sqrt(11) +/- sqrt(16))/9.8

t = (60*sqrt(11) +/- 20)/49

Sorry about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mcairtime said:
s = vt - 0.5at^2

80 = 12*sqrt(11)t - (0.5)(9.8)t^2
Not quite sure what you are doing here. Where's your starting point? You've changed the sign of the acceleration, so up is positive.
 
Hi Doc Al,

Thanks for your response. I'm afraid I am not quite following. As far as I'm aware I'm maintaining down as the positive direction throughout the entire question.

In part a) we have

s = +80 m
u = +4 m/s
v = ?
a = +9.8 m/s^2
t = ?

We use this to find that v = + 12sqrt(11) m/s

For part b) we then have

s = +80 m
u = +4 m/s
v = +12sqrt(11) m/s
a = +9.8 m/s^2
t = ?

and I am getting a funny solution when I plug this into

s = vt - 0.5at^2

The minus sign is part of the equation, but I am subbing in a = + 9.8 m/s^2.

Apologies again if I'm being extra stupid.
 
consider four points in a broader trajectory.
At A, it is at ground, rising at 39.8 m/s. At B, it has risen to 80m, rising still at 4m/s. C and D are the start and end points of the original problem.
Your solution using u gave the times for the C to D and C to A transitions (the second being negative). The s, u and a inputs are the same for both.
Your v equation solution gives the times for the transitions C to D and B to D. The s, v and a inputs are the same for both.
 
mcairtime said:
In part a) we have

s = +80 m
u = +4 m/s
v = ?
a = +9.8 m/s^2
t = ?

We use this to find that v = + 12sqrt(11) m/s

For part b) we then have

s = +80 m
u = +4 m/s
v = +12sqrt(11) m/s
a = +9.8 m/s^2
t = ?
All this is fine. You've solved for the final speed and the time.

mcairtime said:
and I am getting a funny solution when I plug this into

s = vt - 0.5at^2

The minus sign is part of the equation, but I am subbing in a = + 9.8 m/s^2.
I don't understand what you mean when you say "The minus sign is part of the equation". The basic kinematic equation is y = y0 + v0t + 0.5at^2. If you use down as positive, then there will be no minus sign.

Please explain what you are solving for at this point.
 
haruspex said:
consider four points in a broader trajectory.
At A, it is at ground, rising at 39.8 m/s. At B, it has risen to 80m, rising still at 4m/s. C and D are the start and end points of the original problem.
Your solution using u gave the times for the C to D and C to A transitions (the second being negative). The s, u and a inputs are the same for both.
Your v equation solution gives the times for the transitions C to D and B to D. The s, v and a inputs are the same for both.

Yes, that is all crystal clear now. I was having a complete mental block. Seems obvious now. Thanks very much indeed.
 
Doc Al said:
All this is fine. You've solved for the final speed and the time.I don't understand what you mean when you say "The minus sign is part of the equation". The basic kinematic equation is y = y0 + v0t + 0.5at^2. If you use down as positive, then there will be no minus sign.

Please explain what you are solving for at this point.

Hello,

I have worked out where my issue was with the help of haruspex. As well as the equation s = ut + 0.5at^2 there is another equation s = vt - 0.5at^2 (where u is initial velocity and v is the final velocity). I was getting different answers when I used these two different equations and couldn't work out why. Apologies if I was unclear and thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
999
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K