Quick way to tell if two rings are isomorphic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silversonic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Say if the following rings isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}_6 (no justification needed);

1) \mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_3

2) \mathbb {Z}_6 \times \mathbb {Z}_6

3) \mathbb {Z}_{18} / [(0,0) , (2,0)]

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to tell if two rings AREN'T isomorphic - find an essential property that one ring has that another one doesn't. For example part 2), \mathbb {Z}_6 \times \mathbb {Z}_6 has 36 elements, whereas \mathbb {Z}_6 has 6.

But then, how do I show the other two?My notes say the first one is isomorphic to \mathbb {Z}_6 because 2 and 3 are coprime. But how can it justify that so quickly? Because they are coprime both rings have the same characteristic (i.e. n.1 = 0 for n ≥ 1 in both rings). But is that enough to conclude that they are isomorphic?

And for the last one, where can I begin? If I can show both rings are generated by their 1, and both rings have the same characteristic, they should be isomorphic right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one you can do using the Chinese Remainder Theorem if you've seen it. If not,

If I can show both rings are generated by their 1, and both rings have the same characteristic, they should be isomorphic right?

This is a good way to do it. In particular if something is isomorphic to Z6 it should be really easy to construct the isomorphism and prove that it's an isomorphism

Your third one doesn't seem to make any sense though, since Z18 doesn't contain any elements called (0,0) or (2,0) in any standard notation that I have seen
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top