Quick yes or no charged disc e field equation question

AI Thread Summary
The equation for the electric field given is (2*pi*k*omega)[1-(1+(R^2)/(z^2))^-.5], where capital R represents the radius of the charged disk to avoid confusion with the variable r, which denotes the distance from the z-axis in cylindrical coordinates. The use of capital letters for constants and lowercase for variables is a common convention in physics, although there are exceptions. The equation is applicable in both Cartesian and cylindrical coordinates, but it has specific restrictions on the variables for validity. Understanding these conventions and restrictions is crucial for correctly applying the equation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clarity in notation and the context of the equation's use.
charlies1902
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the e field is given by (2*pi*k*omega)[1-(1+(R^2)/(z^2))^-.5]



I was wondering if the capital R in that equation is the radius of the charged disk? And if so, why is it capitalized?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
charlies1902 said:

Homework Statement


the e field is given by (2*pi*k*omega)[1-(1+(R^2)/(z^2))^-.5]
Yeah, that looks about right to me! Good job. :approve:

But I would use the Greek letter sigma, rather than omega, for the surface charge density. There's no particular reason for that except it's more conventional.

\vec E = 2 \pi k \sigma \left(1 - \frac{1}{ \sqrt{1+ \frac{R^2}{z^2}}} \right) \hat z

where \hat z is a unit vector in the z direction. It assumes the disk is on the x-y plane, with the disk's center at the origin.
I was wondering if the capital R in that equation is the radius of the charged disk?
Yes.
And if so, why is it capitalized?
So as not to confuse it with r, the radius component of the position vector (in cylindrical coordinates), the distance to the z-axis. Often you'll find that it is somewhat conventional in physics to use lower case letters for variables and capital letters for constants. (Of course some fundamental constants use Greek letters, or special lowercase letters -- yeah, I know it might be confusing, but it's a loose convention and not cut in stone. You'll often come across exceptions too). It's assumed that the radius of the disk is not dynamically changing, so it's treated as a constant.

The above equation happens to work in both Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) and cylindrical coordinates (r, θ, z). So in the above equation, R is the radius of the disk, not to be confused with r, the distance from the z-axis. But the equation, as it has been solved, is only valid under certain restrictions.

You can't just pick any old r, θ and z and expect the above equation to be valid. There are restrictions on at least one variable. (The equation is not valid in all of space; rather it's valid only on a single, specific line within 3-dimensional space.) Since this is the homework forum, I'll let you ponder what the restriction is, and leave the rest to you. :wink:
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top