bbobb
- 3
- 0
hi,
i make use of the r-square values quite extensively in my modeling work, mainly as an indicator of the 'goodness of fit' between data and linear/exponential models. however, i have often been told that r-squares are not rigorous indicators, especially so in cases where there exists isolated data points that are far from the main group of data as these isolated points will carry more weight in the calculation of r square.
question is, is there any other quantity that is a better quantifier of 'goodness of fit'? personally, an overwhelming majority of the papers that i have read quote r-squares as the preferred indicator.
thanks.
i make use of the r-square values quite extensively in my modeling work, mainly as an indicator of the 'goodness of fit' between data and linear/exponential models. however, i have often been told that r-squares are not rigorous indicators, especially so in cases where there exists isolated data points that are far from the main group of data as these isolated points will carry more weight in the calculation of r square.
question is, is there any other quantity that is a better quantifier of 'goodness of fit'? personally, an overwhelming majority of the papers that i have read quote r-squares as the preferred indicator.
thanks.