Radial Acceleration and Gravitational Force of the Sun in the Milky Way Galaxy

AI Thread Summary
To find the radial acceleration of the Sun in the Milky Way, the period of rotation (200 million years) must be converted into seconds for accurate calculations. The velocity can be determined using the formula v = 2(pi)(r)/period, where r is the distance from the center of the galaxy. Once the velocity is calculated, radial acceleration can be found using a = v^2/r. For the net gravitational force on the Sun, the formula F = mass of the Sun multiplied by the radial acceleration can be applied. Understanding these calculations is essential for determining the Sun's motion within the galaxy.
crazuiee
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Milky Way galaxy (including the sun) rotates about its center with a period of 200 million years. The sun is approx. 2 X 10^20m from the center of the galaxy. What is:
A) The radial acceleration of the sun?
B) What is the net gravitational force on the Sun due to other stars in the Milky Way Galaxy?


Homework Equations


v=2(pi)(r)/period
a=v^2/r


I just can't get my head around the 1 revolution per 200million years. How would I work that into a velocity? And then into an acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the equation - you just need to know how many seconds in 200Myr

(Hint 60*60*24*365.25 * 200,000,000)
 
Then would I divide my seconds by 2(pi)(rad) to get my answer in rad/s?
 
To find the Net gravitational force on the sun due to other stars in the galaxy would it just be F= [mass (of sun)] [acceleration (radial acceleration that was found)]
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top