Radial oscillations of gravitational star

BlackStar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Consider a spherical star made of N (very large number) particles interacting via gravity.Let the mass of ith particle be mi and position be xi
Let ##I= \sum_{i=1}^{N}m_{i}r_{i}##, U be potential energy and K be kinetic energy

1)Show that the virial equation takes the form ##\frac{d^2I}{dt^2}=-2U+c##
where c is a constant
2)The star undergoes small oscillations with radial displacement proportional to radial distance(ri).Show the angular frequency of the radial oscillation is
##\omega =\left (\frac{|U_0|}{I_0} \right )^\frac{1}{2}##
where U0 and I0 are equillibrium values.
3) If the mass density of the star varies radially as r,show that
##\omega =\left (\frac{(5-\alpha) GM }{(5-2\alpha)R^3} \right )^\frac{1}{2}##
where M is total mass and R is radius of the star.

I got the first part (straightforward) but not the other two.
Source:Newtonian Dynamics, Richard Fitzpatrick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like a homework problem to me.

Here is a hint: How do U and I scale if the whole star gets smaller/larger by some constant factor?
Can you use this to express U in terms of I, U0 and I0?

For (C): you can calculate U as function of I.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks i got it now
I'd forgotten use the binomial approximation for the small perturbations , so i thought oscillations weren't simple.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top