Radial resistance of coaxial cable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the radial resistance of coaxial cables, specifically the formula R = [resistivity * natural log(b/a)] / [2*pi*length]. The original poster questions the correctness of the differential form used to derive this formula, particularly regarding the dependence of area on radial length. A suggestion is made to clarify the cross-sectional area as a function of radius, emphasizing the need for proper integration from inner to outer radii. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly defining the area in the context of radial current flow. Overall, the thread seeks to resolve confusion around the derivation of coaxial cable resistance.
azaharak
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
One of the textbooks I've stumbled across states that the radial resistance of a coaxial cable ( current running from inner cylinder to outer cylinder via silicon in between) is given byR = [resistivity * natural log of (b/a)] / [2*pi()*(length of cable)]

where b is the outer radii and a is the inner radiiThe derivation was given as dR= resistivity*dr / A and then integrated from a to b.My question/issue is the dependence of the area on the radial length, I'm not so sure about the correctness of the differential form above.

If you follow through the chain rule with A a function of r

dR/dr= resistivity/Area + (d/dA)*(resistivity*r/Area)*(dA/dr)

which becomes

dR/dr= resistivity/area -[resistivity*r/(Area^2)] * (2*pi()*L)

which becomes

dR/dr=resistivity/area - resistivity/area =0

meaning that the resistance is a constant value which should be

R = resistivity / (2*Pi*L ) where L is the length of the cable (constant)
Help! Thank you very much.Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I did not quite follow what you were trying to do; but I never saw you write the area as a function of r, in the first place.

What you need to do is to write what is the cross-sectional area the a radial current 'sees' at a given radiur r...don't call it A, write the formula...it should simply depend on r, pi, and L; then,
integrate the dR from a to b
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top