Radially infalling object - when to use + or - sqrt?

  • Thread starter Thread starter liron
  • Start date Start date
liron
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object falls radially towards a non rotating black hole from infinity (i.e. the velocity is the same as the escape velocity except negative). The black hole has a Schwarzschild radius of Rs = 2GM/c2 where G is the gravitational constant, M is the black hole's mass and c is the speed of light in free space. The object has mas m and velocity v = dr/dt where r is distance from the centre of the black hole and t is time.

When I calculate the momentum, I can get either a positive or negative result, depending on how I do it, since a square root is involved. I know it should be negative so in this case and in general,how can I be sure I have the right root?

Homework Equations


According to a website I looked up, the velocity should be:

dr/dt = (+/-) sqrt(M/r)(1-Rs/r)

However i believe that M=1 & c=1 in their cauculations. Adding them back in gives:

dr/dt = (+/-) sqrt(2GM/rc2)(1-Rs/r) = Rs/r

Since radius decreases as time increases, the negative root is the correct one:

dr/dt = -c sqrt(Rs/r)(1-Rs/r)

I calculated that the momentum (not 4-momentum) in this situation should be:

p = m v sqrt(1 - Rs/r - v2/(c2(1-Rs/r))

The Attempt at a Solution


When I plug in the velocity into the momentum equation, I get:
p = -mc sqrt(Rs/r)(1-Rs/r) / (sqrt(1 - Rs/r - c2(Rs/r)(1 - Rs/r)2/(c2(1-Rs/r)))

This reduces to:

p = -m c sqrt(Rs/r)(1-Rs/r) / sqrt((1 - Rs/r)(1 - Rs/r))

This reduces to p = -m c sqrt(Rs/r)

However, if I change the second last equation to be:

p = m c sqrt(Rs/r)(Rs/r-1) / sqrt((Rs/r-1)(Rs/r-1))

This reduces to p = m c sqrt(Rs/r)

So depending on how I do my calculations, I can get the answer or the negative of the answer, even when I start out with the correct root.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since momentum is a vector, you would just need to specify its magnitude |dr/dt| and its direction. If I have a vector like <2, - 3>, it doesn't really make sense saying whether its positive or negative.
 
I'll assume the rest of your work is correct. You just need to recognize that ##\sqrt{x^2} = \lvert x \rvert##, so If ##r>R_s##, then ##\sqrt{\left(1-\frac{R_s}{r}\right)^2} = \sqrt{\left(\frac{R_s}{r}-1\right)^2} = 1-\frac{R_s}{r} > 0##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top