Radiant Energy Absorbed by Person's Head with Hair

  • Thread starter Thread starter grandprix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Hair Head
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the radiant energy absorbed by a person's head covered with hair in a shaded environment at 28 degrees Celsius. The correct formula to use is P = emissivity * area * sigma * T^4, with T representing the surrounding temperature, not the body's temperature. The emissivity is noted as 0.85, leading to an absorptivity of 0.15. A common mistake identified is using the temperature of the head instead of the ambient temperature for calculations. The final correct answer for the absorbed energy per second is 6.3 J/s, contrasting with the incorrect initial calculation of 13.9 J/s.
grandprix
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A person is standing outdoors in the shade where the temperature is 28 degrees C. What is the radiant energy absorbed per second by his head when it is covered with hair? The surface area of the hair (assumed to be flat), is 160 cm^2 and its emissivity is 0.85.


Homework Equations


Qrad = emiss*area*sigma*T^4


The Attempt at a Solution



.85 is the emissivity, so the absorptivity is .15

The temperature of the head originally is 98.6 degrees, or 310 K

so

Qrad/T = (.16 m^2)(.15)(5.67 X10^-8)(310^4 - 301^4)

Not sure if this is right?? I am coming with an answer of 13.9, but the book says the answer is 6.3 J/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The absorbed energy per second is given by P=emiss*area*sigma*T^4. T is the temperature of the surroundings, which is 28 degrees in this case; it is not the temperature of the body doing the absorption!

You apparently thought P=absorptivity*area*sigma*(temperature of head)^4, which is not correct.
 
Note that absorptivity = emissivity.

Also, double-check the conversion from cm^2 to m^2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top