Radiation - finding emissivity of a sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the emissivity of a sphere using the equation e=dQ/dt / (A*5.67E-8*T^4), where the surface area is calculated as 4(pi)r^2. The user initially arrives at an emissivity of 0.01625, while the expected answer is 0.0524. Confusion arises regarding the treatment of surrounding air, which is suggested to be considered as a black body, affecting the net radiation due to its lower temperature. It is clarified that the net radiation is the difference between emitted and absorbed radiation, with the absorbed radiation dependent on the emissivity value. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for the surrounding environment's temperature in radiation calculations.
JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
see attached
Relevant Equations
dQ/dt = Ae(5.67*10^-8)*T^4
So using the above equation, e=dQ/dt / (A*5.67E-8*303.8^4)

The surface area of a sphere is 4(pi)r^2 and I get 136.8478 m^2. dQ/dt would be the net radiation (I think? Its in the correct units), 1074W.

Plugging everything in I get 0.01625, but the answer is 0.0524.

Now as I was writing this I figured out how to do it by trial and error but am a bit confused. So apparently the surrounding air is decreasing the net radiation? Is that because its of a lower temperature? So if the air was hotter would I add it instead of subtracting it? Below is the equation I used to solve.

dQ/dt = SA * constant * e * (T of sphere) ^4 - SA * constant * e * (T of air) ^4
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    12.7 KB · Views: 146
Physics news on Phys.org
The question setter seems to expect you to treat the surrounding air as a black body, so subtract the radiation the sphere absorbs from that. The fraction it absorbs will be governed by the same e value.
But it's nonsense. It takes a pretty thick layer of air to radiate much at all, and it certainly is not a black body (fortunately). Even outdoors, most of the received radiation would be from other solid bodies, such as the ground.
 
haruspex said:
The question setter seems to expect you to treat the surrounding air as a black body, so subtract the radiation the sphere absorbs from that. The fraction it absorbs will be governed by the same e value.
But it's nonsense. It takes a pretty thick layer of air to radiate much at all, and it certainly is not a black body (fortunately). Even outdoors, most of the received radiation would be from other solid bodies, such as the ground.
Am I understanding correctly that I subtract the absorbed radiation because its of a lower temperature? In other words, would I add it instead if the surrounding black body had a higher temperature than the sphere?
 
JoeyBob said:
Am I understanding correctly that I subtract the absorbed radiation because its of a lower temperature? In other words, would I add it instead if the surrounding black body had a higher temperature than the sphere?
No, you are told the net radiation from the sphere, so that's radiation out minus radiation in. And 'in' should only be what is absorbed, so depends on e.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top