Radiation - finding emissivity of a sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the emissivity of a sphere using the equation e = dQ/dt / (A * 5.67E-8 * T^4). The surface area of the sphere is calculated as 136.8478 m², with a net radiation (dQ/dt) of 1074W. The initial calculation yields an emissivity of 0.01625, while the expected answer is 0.0524. Participants clarify that the surrounding air, treated as a black body, affects the net radiation, necessitating a subtraction of absorbed radiation when the air temperature is lower than that of the sphere.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Stefan-Boltzmann Law
  • Familiarity with the concept of emissivity
  • Knowledge of thermal radiation principles
  • Basic skills in algebra and equation manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Stefan-Boltzmann Law in detail
  • Explore the concept of black body radiation
  • Learn about the factors affecting emissivity in materials
  • Investigate the impact of surrounding temperatures on thermal radiation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and environmental science, particularly those focused on thermal dynamics and radiation heat transfer.

JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
see attached
Relevant Equations
dQ/dt = Ae(5.67*10^-8)*T^4
So using the above equation, e=dQ/dt / (A*5.67E-8*303.8^4)

The surface area of a sphere is 4(pi)r^2 and I get 136.8478 m^2. dQ/dt would be the net radiation (I think? Its in the correct units), 1074W.

Plugging everything in I get 0.01625, but the answer is 0.0524.

Now as I was writing this I figured out how to do it by trial and error but am a bit confused. So apparently the surrounding air is decreasing the net radiation? Is that because its of a lower temperature? So if the air was hotter would I add it instead of subtracting it? Below is the equation I used to solve.

dQ/dt = SA * constant * e * (T of sphere) ^4 - SA * constant * e * (T of air) ^4
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    12.7 KB · Views: 161
Physics news on Phys.org
The question setter seems to expect you to treat the surrounding air as a black body, so subtract the radiation the sphere absorbs from that. The fraction it absorbs will be governed by the same e value.
But it's nonsense. It takes a pretty thick layer of air to radiate much at all, and it certainly is not a black body (fortunately). Even outdoors, most of the received radiation would be from other solid bodies, such as the ground.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob
haruspex said:
The question setter seems to expect you to treat the surrounding air as a black body, so subtract the radiation the sphere absorbs from that. The fraction it absorbs will be governed by the same e value.
But it's nonsense. It takes a pretty thick layer of air to radiate much at all, and it certainly is not a black body (fortunately). Even outdoors, most of the received radiation would be from other solid bodies, such as the ground.
Am I understanding correctly that I subtract the absorbed radiation because its of a lower temperature? In other words, would I add it instead if the surrounding black body had a higher temperature than the sphere?
 
JoeyBob said:
Am I understanding correctly that I subtract the absorbed radiation because its of a lower temperature? In other words, would I add it instead if the surrounding black body had a higher temperature than the sphere?
No, you are told the net radiation from the sphere, so that's radiation out minus radiation in. And 'in' should only be what is absorbed, so depends on e.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
962
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K