Radiation in the far field for a current carrying loop

Mr. Rho
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
Hi people, I have a problem with some integral here.

I have a loop of radius a, with a current I = Ioe-iωt' and trying to calculate the radiating fields in the far zone, my procedement is:

Current density: J(r',t') = Ioδ(r'-a)δ(θ'-π/2)e-iωt'/2πa2 φ (φ direction)

Here t' = t - |r-r'|/c (retarded time)

I evaluate the vector potential: A(r,t) = ∫vJ(r',t')dV/|r-r'|

I approximate 1/|r-r'| ≈ 1/r because in the far zone this term does not affect too much compared with the exponential, and |r-r'| ≈ r - aSinθCos(φ-φ') for the exponential, that plays a major role in the far zone.

The problem is that I reach integrals that I can't solve:

∫ sinφ' e-ikaSinθCos(φ-φ') dφ' for x direction

and ∫ sinφ' e-ikaSinθCos(φ-φ') dφ' for y direction (both integrals from 0 to 2π).

Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I don't know, any help?

(r' are the source coordinates and r the observer coordinates)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually it is assumed that you are working with low enough frequencies and a small enough loop that you can take ##a## to be small in relation to the wavelength of the radiation. Then you can approximate ##e^{-ika \sin \theta \cos (\phi - \phi ')}##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top