Yes in the sense that they both arise from the same effect, namely radiation emitted by an accelerating charge. Given by the Larmor formula for a nonrelativistic charge and the Lienard formula for a relativistic one.
However the term Bremsstrahlung is unfortunately used in situations which don't really deserve the term. Strictly speaking, Bremsstrahlung only applies to the deceleration of a charged particle entering matter, such as the slowing of an electron when it encounters an atom. The radiation emitted by particles in a particle accelerator is sometimes called Bremsstrahlung, but it ain't.
'Bremsstrahlung' is also used for photons emitted during the scattering of a particle.
In my experience, Bremsstrahlung refers to radiation by a single particle, not by an oscillating current.
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
The wavefunction of an atomic orbital like ##p_x##-orbital is generally in the form ##f(\theta)e^{i\phi}## so the probability of the presence of particle is identical at all the directional angles ##\phi##. However, it is dumbbell-shape along the x direction which shows ##\phi##-dependence!