Radius of charged particle moving in magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of curvature for a +2 helium atom accelerated by 1700 V in a magnetic field of 0.5 T. The key equation for the radius is R = mv/qB, but the user struggles with finding the velocity since time is not provided in the problem. They assume the particle starts at rest and relate acceleration to force and mass, leading to a derived expression for R. However, the absence of time in the problem creates confusion, as it is crucial for determining the particle's velocity. The user seeks clarification on whether they are missing any essential information to solve the problem.
1missing
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So, I got the problem from a friend who told me he copied it down in haste, so it's possible that my confusion stems from a missing variable, but I just want to be certain as my exam is in a few days. So the problem states that there's a +2 helium atom that was accelerated by 1700 V. What will be the radius of curvature if it moves in a plane perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field of .5T ?

Homework Equations


R = mv/qB
F = Eq
v = at

The Attempt at a Solution


So, the first thing I notice is that the only variable I'm not given that is needed to solve for the radius is the velocity of the particle. I'm assuming the particle started at rest and was then accelerated, so then the velocity is equal to just the acceleration times time. The acceleration could be expressed as force over mass, so then I just needed an expression for the force.

F = Eq
a = Eq/m
v = Eqt/m
R = (m/qB)(Eqt/m)

The masses cancel, the charges cancel, and I'm left with the voltage times time divided by the magnetic field.

R = Et/B

My problem is I'm not given time anywhere in the problem, but it's obviously essential to know how long the particle was accelerating. Am I missing something here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
accidental post, sorry. disregard
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top