Raising Operator (Harmonic Oscillator)

heardie
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
This is (another!) question I cannot solve
The ground state wavefunction for the harmonic oscillator can be written as
$\chi _0 = \left( {\frac{\alpha }<br /> {\pi }} \right)^{\frac{1}<br /> {4}} \exp \left( {\frac{{ - \alpha x^2 }}<br /> {2}} \right)$<br />

where $\alpha = \sqrt {\frac{{mk}}<br /> {{\hbar ^2 }}} $<br />

We are then asked to apply the rasing operator:
d/dy-y

where $y = \sqrt \alpha x$<br />
First of all, does this mean replace all alphas, and x's with y's? (Is it even possible to get rid of all x's? I end up with a y/x in there), and then apply
d(chi)/dy-y*chi
Is that what the operator is doing? I don't see the significane of the answer. If I apply the lowering operator (d/dy + y) I still get 'an' answer, when I figure I should get something to tell me I can't go lower then the groud state (a zero perhaps, or a mathematical impossibility like division by zero)

Anyway...if anyone can shed some light on this it would eb much appreciated!

Edit: I can't figure out division on this board! I swear to god I am doing it right...I will post my operator down here...if someone can point out the latex error I'd love to know:
\[<br /> \frac{d}<br /> {{dy}} - y<br /> \]<br /> <br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I swear my equations are printing in the wrong order above. For reference:
Raising operator - d/dy - y
where y = sqrt(alpha)*x

Oh and I get
-1/2\,{\frac {{e^{-1/2\,\alpha\,{x}^{2}}} \left( -1+4\,\alpha\,{x}^{2}<br /> \right) }{x\sqrt [4]{\alpha\,\pi }}}<br />

Is this the first excited state? Pretty sure I would have made an error somewhere there!
 
Dont worry. Completly missed something here. All makes sesnse now. Can I delete this thread somehow?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top