Random electron striking a neutral conductor

AI Thread Summary
When a random electron strikes a neutral conductor, it does not necessarily increase the conductor's voltage significantly due to the conductor's ability to dissipate excess charge. Conductors are typically connected to other conductive materials or grounded, allowing any net charge from electron strikes to flow away. The frequent occurrence of charged particles, such as cosmic rays, does not lead to dangerous voltage buildup because the charge can escape through various mediums. Even isolated conductors are not truly isolated, as they interact with surrounding air and moisture. Therefore, the risk of electrocution from such events is minimal.
Bruce Haawkins
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
if a random electron strikes a neutral conductor does it get absorbed and increase the voltage of the conductor
 
Physics news on Phys.org
since the electron has a negative charge and the conductor has a neutral charge it makes sense to me that the electron will absorb. However if I had 10 electrons striking the conductor and a nano secound later five and the conductor was connected to the earth, will any of the electrons reflect
 
You need to be aware that charge particles strike a lot of things, including conductors, all the time. Cosmic rays consist of such particles. So this is not uncommon.

So now, use this experience that you live with everyday to come up with a plausible answer. After all, if charge particle strikes are common, why haven't you been electrocuted yet due to this buildup in voltage? Most conductors are attached to other conductors and other things. Most are grounded. Any net charge that a conductor gets from such strikes will flow out of that conductor. Even one that is isolated is not truly "isolated", because it is surrounded by air, water vapor, etc. where at some point, access charge will be able to escape.

Zz.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Bruce Haawkins
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top