B Wi-Fi Waves: Why Short Range & Microwaves for Long Distances?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Photo1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Range Waves
AI Thread Summary
Wi-Fi waves have a short range primarily due to lower transmitted power levels and the use of omnidirectional antennas, while point-to-point microwave links can achieve longer distances because they utilize higher power, directional antennas, and line-of-sight connections. The effectiveness of these microwave links is enhanced by their ability to avoid obstacles, resulting in minimal signal attenuation. Receiver sensitivity plays a significant role in range, often more so than output power. Additionally, Wi-Fi operates under strict power regulations, limiting its range compared to microwave communications, which are not subject to the same restrictions. Overall, the combination of power, antenna design, and environmental factors determines the effectiveness of these communication methods.
Photo1234
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Why do Wi-Fi waves have such short distance and some microwaves are used for sending information through long distances?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there
welcome to PF :smile:

Photo1234 said:
Why do Wi-Fi waves have such short distance and some microwaves are used for sending information through long distances?
the difference in transmitted power levels and antennas ... simple as that

Also point to point microwave links will be line of sight (LOS) ... this provides the least attenuation possibleDave
 
Last edited:
Point to point microwave links don't have to work through walls, have higher power, use much better (more directive) antennas, and might have better receivers. The communication networks also may have other redundant links to deal with drop-outs (thunderstorms etc.). Other than that they are pretty much the same thing.
 
It's not just a matter of output power. Like DaveE says, I have usually found that Receiver sensitivity is a bigger contributor to range than output power.
The frequencies used, and therefore the path loss also affect the range. Anything longer than ~ 8 miles also requires a higher elevation on the antennas.
 
As previous answers, output power, Line of Sight and receiver sensitivity do matter. Also the antenna gain. As WI-Fi uses unlicensed 2.4GHz band, there are power restrictions in most of the regions. Typical maximum 1W (30dBm) of actual power and 4W (36dBm) of EIRP which includes antenna gain. That means if 30dBm actual power is used maximum antenna gain must be 6dBm, where as if 26dBm power is used maximum antenna gain could be 10dBm.
Consider you have a highly directional 24dBi outdoor Wi-Fi grid antenna, then your actual power could be maximum of 12dBm, so the maximum power would be 36dBm. That limits the combination of high gain antenna and actual power.

Point to point microwave communication does not come under these regulations. They use much higher actual power coupled with a highly directional antenna.

One extreme use cases is S band satellite communication. S band is between 2GHz to 4GHz and it is used to communicate with Geostationary Satellites at 36000km away.
Where as
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top