Rate Constant Graph: Answer Insufficient Data

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the relationship between the rate constants of two reactions based on their concentration versus time plots. One participant argues that insufficient information is available to compare the rate constants due to unknown reaction orders, suggesting option d) as the answer. Another participant believes that the linear nature of the curves indicates the reaction orders are the same, implying a constant rate of change. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding reaction orders in analyzing kinetic data. Ultimately, the conclusion remains that the data provided does not allow for a definitive comparison of the rate constants.
temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

A student is examining the kinetics of two reactions, A → products and B → products. The concentrations of A and B were measured as a function of time (in separate experiments) and the following plot was made:

http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/9215/ratel.jpg

The relationship between the rate constants is:
a) kA > kB
b) kA < kB
c) kA = kB
d) Insufficient information to know

The attempt at a solution

I think the right answer is d), since you don't know what the reaction orders are for the two lines. Therefore, you can't compare the rate constants. Am I right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello!
I think the reaction orders are the same, as both the 'curves' are straight (that sentence is peculiar!). If either were dependent on the concentrations, then the rate of change wouldn't be constsant (and the slope wouldn't be linear), as it would be dependent on the concentration at that particular point in time; and as the concentration of reactants decreases, the rate at which the reactants form products would decrease with time. I think!
Hope that helps!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top