Rate Law Problem: Finding the Rate Law from Reaction Data

  • Thread starter Thread starter jools111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Rate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the rate law for a reaction involving iodide and persulfate based on provided concentration and time data. The user deduces that the rate law is r = k [I] [S2O8], noting that doubling the concentration of iodide halves the reaction time, which suggests first-order dependence on both reactants. However, there is confusion regarding the interpretation of the data, particularly when varying persulfate concentration while keeping iodide constant, leading to longer reaction times. It is clarified that the rate is indeed first order in both reagents, and a potential typographical error in the concentration notation may have contributed to the misunderstanding. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate chemical notation in rate law calculations.
jools111
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I am working on a lab that deals with ionic concentration and rate of reaction. The data is as follows:

Mixture----- mol/L-----[S2O8] mol/L------Time s

1-----------0.10---------0.050-------------20
2-----------0.075--------0.050-------------28
3-----------0.050--------0.050-------------41
4-----------0.025--------0.050-------------84
5-----------0.10---------0.038-------------25
6-----------0.10---------0.025-------------39
7-----------0.10---------0.013-------------82

The question asks me to write the rate law for the reaction. I know from the data that when the concentration of doubles, the reaction time gets cut in half. The same is true for the persulphate. So I am thinking that the rate law would be:

r = k [S2O8]

Something doesn't sit well with this answer though. When the persulphate is being varies and the iodide remains constant, the reactions take longer, even though they are proportionately rougly the same. Am I missing something here? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Something must have messed up when you typed this in, because your reasoning is spot on, but the answers as given are wrong. Whatever the first column of concentration data was supposed to represent didn't get displayed properly.

The answer is that the rate is first order in both reagents, which is what I think you tried to type in the first place. As for the something that doesn't sit well, I'm afraid I don't quite understand what the concern is.
 
A few years late, perhaps, but I think the OP should have typed [I-], but typed [I ] (only without the space), which is wrong chemically, and also is the code for italics.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top