Engineering Rate of change of current in an R-L Circuit

Click For Summary
In an R-L circuit, the current cannot change suddenly unless an impulse voltage source is applied. When using a DC source, the initial current at t=0+ equals that at t=0-, leading to the conclusion that di/dt at t=0+ is zero. However, discussions reveal that the voltage across the inductor at t=0 is not zero, which means di/dt is not necessarily zero. Source transformation can simplify the analysis, resulting in a series RL circuit where the current change rate can be calculated. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding inductor behavior in response to voltage changes.
jaus tail
Messages
613
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


upload_2018-5-18_12-18-4.png


Homework Equations


Current cannot change suddenly through inductor unless input is impulse voltage source.

The Attempt at a Solution


since input is DC source we have i(0+) = i(0-) so we have di/dt at t = 0+ is 0.
Is it correct? Book has mentioned answer as B which is weird cause there is no Ls in circuit.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-5-18_12-18-4.png
    upload_2018-5-18_12-18-4.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 3,519
Physics news on Phys.org
jaus tail said:
Book has mentioned answer as B which is weird cause there is no Ls in circuit.
It's probably a typo. They meant Is instead of Ls.

jaus tail said:
since input is DC source we have i(0+) = i(0-) so we have di/dt at t = 0+ is 0.
No.
How about using source transformation? It will make the circuit look more familiar.
 
  • Like
Likes jaus tail
Wow... I used laplace and then got the answer. You're right.
upload_2018-5-18_16-41-37.png

But shouldn't it be zero as per concept? Unless the input is an impulse voltage source the current across inductor cannot change so quickly. V = L di/dt. So unless V is an impulse, di/dt has to be zero.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-5-18_16-41-37.png
    upload_2018-5-18_16-41-37.png
    48.1 KB · Views: 1,542
jaus tail said:
Wow... I used laplace and then got the answer. You're right.
Well, if you use source transformation, you end up with a series RL circuit with Rtotal=Rs+R and inductance L, excited by a voltage source of emf IsRs.
At t=0+, no current flows through the inductor, which means the entire source voltage appears across the inductor.
So, IsRs=Ldi/dt, which gives di/dt=IsRs/L.
jaus tail said:
the current across inductor cannot change so quickly. V = L di/dt. So unless V is an impulse, di/dt has to be zero.
No, here VL at t=0 is not zero, hence di/dt is also not zero. You can't compare the currents at t=0- and t=0+ to find di/dt at t=0+ because at t=0-, the inductor was not excited.
 
Well you're method is way quicker than mine.
Thanks a lot. Learnt new thing today.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K