Ratio between change in Energy(Gravitational Potential)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the ratio of change in gravitational potential energy between two objects at altitude h: one that remains at rest and another that enters orbit. Object A's energy change is calculated as the difference in gravitational potential energy, while Object B's total energy change includes both kinetic and gravitational potential energy. The user expresses confusion about the correct approach to calculating these energy changes, particularly regarding the signs of the energies involved. They seek clarification on whether to use total orbital energy for Object B and how to simplify their calculations. The conversation highlights the complexities of energy calculations in gravitational contexts and the need for accurate simplification methods.
fahlim003
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ratio between change of Energy(Gravitational Potential)

I would like some assistance in understanding the ratio of change in energy between two objects.

In this case, if object A goes from rest to an altitude (h) above Earth but does not begin an orbit versus object B goes from rest to the same altitude and then proceeds to orbit the earth.

The variables are as follows:
Re=radius of earth
h=altitude
G=universal gravitational constant
M=mass of earth
m=mass of object(A=B, also known as A and B are the same)

I'll need to transcribe my findings, which until now when comparing to my professors simplication are slightly off, a little later.

I was told my error might occur in the initial change of energies for the respective objects, and this may very well be true. However, I did come across great challenges at first when trying to find a GCF for the variable laden energies.

What I've been using prior to simplication:
Object A = change in Eg = Eg2 - Eg1
Object B = change in total energy = Ek - Eg1

Eg as known is a negative value while Ek is positive.

Any help is appreciated and I understand little help may be offered since I've yet to put up the actual attempts, but when I have more time I'll transcribe my most recent effort into mspaint.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A good turnout.
Ok, here's my most recent work.

http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/3044/ratioworkingqk8.png


Am I not correct in choosing the E2 and E1 for the object heading into orbit?
I choose Total Orbital Energy (-Ek) since that is energy required to orbit for object B. Although, wouldn't it be possible to put change of energy for the object heading to altitude h as simply Ek instead of -Ek-(Eg)? I would really like some input on this.


Also, it's been a long time since I did any Calculus and or math in general, which may explain why I have trouble with simplification.

Some ratios, albeit told as wrong by my professor include:

http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/3913/resultseh6.png

With the last in the line being the earliest example and least correct.

As mentioned, the first two were said to be nearly correct, although it's been a few days since I spoke to her so I cannot say which is more correct.

Again, help is appreciated. Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top