Ratio test, why does the (-1)^(n+1) disappear?

AI Thread Summary
In the ratio test, the term (-1)^(n+1) oscillates between -1 and 1, but it does not affect the limit as n approaches infinity. The test focuses on the absolute value of the ratio |An+1 / An|, which simplifies the calculations by allowing the oscillating terms to be disregarded. This is because the limit of the absolute values converges, while the oscillating signs do not impact the overall convergence behavior. Therefore, the oscillating factors can be factored out without affecting the outcome of the limit. The discussion clarifies that recognizing this allows for a simpler application of the ratio test.
CinderBlockFist
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
In the book while doing the ratio test:

as n --> infinity

why do they just have (-1)^(n+1) just disappear in the next step, since it oscillates between -1 and 1, I don't understand how u could just make it disappear in computations. Isn't the limit as n -> infinity , equal to D.N.E.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the ratio test tests the absolute value of |An+1 / An|. so the (-1)^n and (-1)^n+1 will just be one, so u can just take it out.
 
crap lol, i didn't even think of that. THanks cyrus, u da man!
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How does the ratio test fail and the root test succeed here?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Interval of convergence of power series from ratio test
Replies
2
Views
1K
MHB Ratio Test Determines Divergence: 11.6.1
Replies
2
Views
2K
On the ratio test for power series
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Binomial Distribution: Likelihood Ratio Test for Equality of Several Proportions
Replies
1
Views
3K
Dispersion of rightward steps in 1-D random walks
Replies
3
Views
564
I Akaike Information Criterion Vs Likelihood Ratio Test
Replies
5
Views
4K
MHB Likelihood Ratio Test for Common Variance from Two Normal Distribution Samples
Replies
1
Views
3K
I How Does the Ratio Test Determine Convergence in Power Series?
Replies
19
Views
2K
Projectile motion with ##N## bounces on the ground
Replies
21
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top