Rational power of complex number-calculation

neginf
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use definition (1), Sec. 28 of z^c to show that (-1 + i*sqrt(3))^(3/2) = +/- 2*sqrt(2)

Homework Equations



z^c = e^(c*log z)

The Attempt at a Solution



(-1 + i * sqrt(3))^(3/2) = e^[(3/2) * log(-1 + i * sqrt(3))]
= e^[(3/2) * (ln| 4 | + i * arg(-1 + i * sqrt(3))]
= e^[(3/2) * (2 * ln 2 + i * 2* pi / 3)]
=e^[(3/2) * 2 * ln 2 + (3/2) * 2 * i * pi / 3 ]
=e^[3 * ln 2 + i * pi]
=e^[3 * ln 2] * e^(i * pi)
=(e^ln2)^3 * (cos(pi) + i * sin(pi))
=2^3 * (-1)
=-8.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not the way I would do it. I would use DeMoivre's formula:
(r e^{i\theta})^n= r^n e^{i n\theta}

Here, z= -1+ i\sqrt{3}. Drawing that point on the complex plane and dropping a perpendicular to the real axis gives a right triangle with legs of length 1 and \sqrt{3}. The hypotenuse has length \sqrt{1^2+ \sqrt{3}^2}= \sqrt{1+ 3}= \sqrt{4}= 2 so r= 2. Further, since the hypotenuse is exactly twice the leg along the real axis, duplicating the right triangle on the other side of the vertical line gives an equilateral triangle. The angle at the vertex is \pi/3 so \theta= \pi- \pi/3= 2\pi/3.

z= 2 e^{i2\pi/3}so z^{3/2}= 2^{3/2}e^{(i2\pi/3)(3/2)}= 2^{3/2)e^{i\pi}<br /> reduce that to rectangular form.<br /> <br /> Of course, adding 2\pi to the argument will not change z but <br /> z^{3/2}= 2^{3/2}e^{(i(2pi/3+ 2\pi))(3/2)}= 2^{3/2}e^{(i 8\pi/3)(3/2)}= 2^{3/2}e^{i4\pi}
 
Thank you for that. I see how you get the +/- 2*sqrt(2).
I think what I did wrong was the ln(|-1+i*sqrt(3)|) which is ln 2, not 2*ln 2 since |-1+i*sqrt(3)| is 2, not 4.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top