Rationale of the position operator?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
PerpStudent
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Why is the position operator of a particle on the x-axis defined by x multiplied by the wave function? Is there an intuitive basis for this or is it merely something that simply works in QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiplication by x is not in general the position operator. "x multiplied by the wave function" would be the correct recipe if by wave function you specifically mean the particle's state ket projected onto the position basis, ψ(x)=<x|ψ>. But often people speak about other "wavefunctions" such as the particle's state representation in momentum space, ψ'(p)=<p|ψ>. In the momentum basis, the (one-dimensonal) position operator is [tex]\hat{x}=i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial p}[/tex]

Multiplication by x is the position operator only in the position basis. Measuring the position of a particle causes the particle's state to collapse into an eigenstate of the position basis. This means it has a definite position. If you know a particle's position exactly, let's say it's at q along the x-axis, then the probability of finding the particle at q is 100% and the probability of finding it anywhere else is 0%. So if a particle has the definite position q, then its wavefunction in the position basis must look like a dirac delta function centered at q, which would be written δ(x-q).

Multiplying the dirac delta function by x,
xδ(x-q) = qδ(x-q)
since δ(x-q) is zero everywhere except at x=q. You should be able to see that in the position basis, the delta functions are the eigenfunctions of multiplication by x and their eigenvalues are equal to their position.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that's very helpful.
 
Look at the 2 formulas for the expectation of the position operator:
[tex] \langle \hat{x} \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{x \, \psi^{\ast}(x) \, \psi(x) \, dx} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\psi^{\ast}(x) \, \hat{x} \, \psi(x) \, dx}[/tex]
This has to be true for all possible wave functions. Comparing the 2, we conclude that:
[tex] \hat{x} \, \psi(x) = x \, \psi(x)[/tex]
This is generally true for every operator in its own eigenbasis representation.