Raw moments of Gaussian Distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the raw moments of a Gaussian distribution, specifically the moments up to the fourth moment, which are provided in detail. The user is seeking the eighth moment, noting that calculating it involves tedious integrals, although the property of Gaussian distributions indicates that all central moments above the second are zero. The conversation includes a derivation for the third moment, illustrating the relationship between the moments and the parameters of the distribution. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of calculating higher moments while acknowledging the simplifications available through the properties of Gaussian distributions. Understanding these moments is crucial for solving related problems in statistics and probability.
SeriousNoob
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering if there was a table of moments for a Gaussian Distribution, I found one up to the fourth moment
U \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2)
E[U^2]=\mu^2+\sigma^2
E[U^3]=\mu^3+3\mu\sigma^2
E[U^4]=\mu^4+6\mu\sigma^2+3\sigma^4

I'm doing a problem right now and i need the 8th moment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a straightforward (tedious) integral.
 
You do not need to do integrals if you know the property of the Gaussian distribution that all central moments above 2 are 0. But I'm not saying it is the easiest method. Here is how you do it for m_3:

m_3 = \left< (x-<x>)^2 \right> = <x^3> - 3<x>^3 + 3<x><x^2> + <x>^3 = <x^3> + <x>^3 + 3 <x> ( <x^2> - <x>^2) = m_3 + \mu^3 + 3<x>\sigma^2 = 0

From this we get:

m_3 = \mu \sigma^2 + \mu^3

And so on...
 
Last edited:
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
Back
Top