Rayleigh criterion and circular apertures- check my work?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the Rayleigh criterion to determine the minimum angular separation for distinguishing two stars and the maximum distance for distinguishing two headlights. The calculations for the minimum angular separation yield approximately 7.69e-3 degrees, which aligns with the small angle approximation formula used. For the maximum distance, the derived value of 11.2 km appears excessively high, raising questions about potential errors in the calculation. Overall, the initial answers seem correct, but the second part may require further verification due to the unexpectedly large distance. The conclusion affirms the correctness of the first calculation while suggesting a review of the second.
cep
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Rayleigh criterion and circular apertures-- check my work?

Homework Statement


Think of the pupil of your eye as a circular aperture 5.00 mm in diameter. Assume you are viewing light of wavelength 550 nm, to which your eyes are maximally sensitive.
a) What is the minimum angular separation at which you can distinguish two stars?
b) What is the maximum distance at which you can distinguish the two headlights of a car mounted 1.50 m apart?

Homework Equations



\ThetaR = sin-1(1.22\lambda/d) and sin\Theta = 1.22\lambda/d, where d is the diameter of the aperture and theta is the angle from the central axis through the opening to the first diffraction minimum. \ThetaR is the minimum resolvable angular separation in radians.

small angle approximations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm pretty sure my answer to (a) is right. Due to the small angle approximation, \ThetaR = 1.22*5.5e-7/5e-3 = 1.34e-4 radians * (180/pi) = 7.69e-3 degrees.

I'm less sure about (b). Call the distance between the headlights s and the orthogonal distance from one headlight to your eye l. For small angles, sin\Theta is approximately \Theta is approximately tan\Theta = s/l. Using the answer obtained in (a), s/l = 1.34e-4 radians. l = 1.5/1.34e-4 = 1.12e4 m = 11.2 km. I don't know what mistake I would've made, but that seems awfully far.

Let me know what you think! Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you are correct on both counts.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top