RC Circuits: Calculating Voltage

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time 't' for the voltage across a capacitor array (Vc) to reach 80% of the initial voltage (Vo), the relevant equations are Vc = Vo (1 - e^[-(t/tau)]) and tau = R.C. The ratio Vc/Vo at 80% is 0.8, which simplifies the equation to 0.8 = 1 - e^[-(t/tau)]. Rearranging this gives e^[-(t/tau)] = 0.2, leading to t = -tau * ln(0.2). The final expression for 't' can be derived in terms of the resistances and capacitances involved.
rickstar008
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to answer the following equation but I just can't get my head around it!

'calculate the time taken 't' for the voltage over capacitor array (Vc) to reach 80% of Vo, in terms of Vo, R, C1 and C2 (caps are in parallel)'



I know I need these two equations but I just don't know what to do with them:
Vc = Vo (1 - e^[-(t/tau)])
tau = R.C



I have tried solving it but I just doesn't make sense and there isn't an RC circuit calculator that I can check my answer with :(, anyways help would be fantastic, thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is Vc/Vo when Vc reaches 80% of Vo?
 
Hi there, in this part of the question, the values of Vc and Vo aren't given so I'm not too sure where to go from there
 
No matter what the actual value of Vc is, the ratio Vc/Vo is...?
 
oooops sorry, the exact question I have is:

1) Consider the circuit in fig. 1
a) Derive the expression for the time taken for the p.d., Vc, across the capacitor array to reach 80% of Vo in terms of C1, C2, R and Vo
 
rickstar008 said:
oooops sorry, the exact question I have is:

1) Consider the circuit in fig. 1
a) Derive the expression for the time taken for the p.d., Vc, across the capacitor array to reach 80% of Vo in terms of C1, C2, R and Vo

And again I ask you to consider what the statement "Vc across the capacitor array to reach 80% of Vo" implies for the ratio Vc/Vo.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top