Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Re: Minimal Detectable Signal

  1. Jun 8, 2007 #1
    Hi all,

    I want to detect a 50 uV (microvolts) signal from a sensor. I was wondering what's the minimal detectable signal from the circuitry on the market/in the industry now? I know that if I have a humongous setup for noise supression, I can detect 1 uV even, but I do have a size limitation on the amplifying and conditioning circuitry. In short, it has to be small (less than 1cm by 1cm). Does it sound impossilbe to detect the 50 uV signal with the space limitation?

    Thanks,
    Michael
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 8, 2007 #2
    What exactly are you trying to detect? A DC voltage or an RF signal?

    In either case it's more than feasible to detect 50 uV.
     
  4. Jun 11, 2007 #3

    xez

    User Avatar

    50uV is generally a trivially easily detectable signal level
    with respect to its magnitude.
    The complications will only be relative to :

    1) the fidelity and precision at which you need to know the
    sensor's signal. e.g say 50uV is the average amplitude, it's
    possible that you'll want much better resolution so you
    can know not only whether 50uV is "present or absent",
    but to have a very well resolved waveform of the 50uV
    magnitude signal's waveform to see the fine details of that
    waveform. So therefore you'd need perhaps much better
    than 50uV resolution to have a quality picture of the
    DETAILS of the 50uV amplitude signal waveform.

    2) The quantity and type of noise present that is in
    the same frequency range as the signal to be measured.
    If there's a lot of noise intrinsic in the sensor, in the
    environment, in the measurement circuitry, then your
    measurements will have some uncertainty and corruption
    due to the noise. The figure of merit is called the
    "signal to noise" ratio and it determines the achievable
    accuracy and confidence level of any particular
    measurement. Using averaging on multiple measurements
    can help reduce the uncertainty due to some kinds of
    random noise if the signal being measured has some
    correlation / statistical properties that is different than
    the perhaps more 'random' (or at least distinct) types of
    noise.

    3) The frequency bandwidth of the signal of interest.
    It's more challenging to measure extremely wide
    (or extremely narrow) bands of signal frequencies in the
    presence of noise and relative to the constraints of your
    measurement circuitry than it is to measure moderately
    narrowband and low frequency types of signals.

    For example, a very common and cheap
    16 bit analog to digital converter (which is basically
    common in even $25 computer "sound cards")
    will measure the minimum signal of 1/65536th of its
    maximum allowable signal level. If the maximum allowed
    signal level was 2.5 Volts (a fairly common value)
    can resolve a minimum of a 2.5 Volts / 65536 = 38
    microvolt signal at its least significant bit, so it'd tell
    the presence or absence of a 50uV signal but you'd have
    no real resolution of the details (waveform) of the signal.

    Fortunately, it's also very cheap and trivial these days
    to get even 20 or 24 bit ADCs (analog to digital) converters
    which can measure at resolutions of 1/2^NBITS of the
    applied maximum voltage reference values, so...

    20 bits ADC: 1/2^20 = 1/1048576 =
    0.95 microvolts minimum resolution per volt of
    the full scale reference voltage. So with Vref = 2.5V
    that's 2.5 * 0.95micro = 2.375 microvolts being the
    minimally resolved signal. Relative to a 50uV PEAK
    sensor signal, a resolution of 2.375uV would give
    50uV/2.375uV a resolution of around 21 'steps' of
    sensor signal waveform shape information with very
    common and inexpensive measurement circuitry.
    Typically 20 bit ADCs would be available to run up to
    a sampling rate of at least 96 kilohertz, so in
    measuring the sensor value at 96kHz rate you could
    discern sensor fluctuations in a bandwidth of
    well less than 48kHz or so.

    It's also very common to use integrated circuit amplifiers
    to preamplify the input sensor signal before that signal
    is fed to an analog to digital converter to be measured.

    I've recently done some consulting on the design of a
    project that used a common $3 dual op-amp with a gain
    of 40,000 to amplify a 1 microvolt level antenna sensor
    signal up to the level of 40 millivolts (x40000) prior
    to that greatly amplified signal being fed to a
    10 bit Analog to digital converter chip to be measured.

    In radio receivers it's not uncommon to amplify 0.1 uV
    level signals by factors of something like ten million
    before they're powerful enough to be decoded and used to
    power speakers etc.

    As to what can be achieved in 1cm^2 of PCB real estate?
    Well you can certainly fit a low noise op-amp to amplify
    the signal and something like an SPI 12bit ADC and a
    small microprocessor (PIC or AVR type) in such a space.
    If your microprocessor was elsewhere and you only needed
    to digitize the signal with an op-amp and ADC and feed
    it to a connector then that would be even easier and
    could be done with one or two common cheap surface
    mount ICs.

    Thermocouples generate only a few of microvolts of
    signal per degree centigrade and single chip thermocouple
    digitizer chips just a few square millimeters commonly
    measure those signals with a precision of a millivolt or two
    for around $2/chip. Similar chips are used to monitor
    the charge and discharge functions of lithium ion batteries
    and they deal with measuring comparably small voltages.

    http://www.linear.com/pc/productDetail.jsp?navId=H0,C1,C1155,C1001,C1152,P37907
    LTC2450 - Easy-to-Use, Ultra-Tiny 16-Bit Delta Sigma ADC
    * GND to VCC Single-Ended Input Range
    * 0.02LSB RMS Noise
    * 2LSB INL, No Missing Codes
    * 2LSB Offset Error
    * 4LSB Full-Scale Error
    * Single Conversion Settling Time for Multiplexed Applications
    * Single Cycle Operation with Auto Shutdown
    * 350µA Supply Current
    * 50nA Sleep Current
    * 30 Conversions Per Second
    * Internal Oscillator—No External Components Required
    * Single Supply, 2.7V to 5.5V Operation
    * SPI Interface
    * Ultra-Tiny 2mm x 2mm DFN Package

    That'll measure around 1/2^14th of a 3V signal, so
    around 183uV minimum detected signal in a tiny space,
    so if you preceded it by an appropriate low noise
    op-amp with a voltage gain of 500 that'd turn your
    50uV signal into a 25mV signal and then that'd be
    digitized to a resolution of 25mV/183uV = 136 steps
    of resolution, all within your space requirements for
    well under $20 worth of parts and printed circuit board.

    As the other poster mentioned, Maxim has several
    16 and 18 bit ADC chips in the required size, sensitivity,
    range. e.g.
    http://para.maxim-ic.com/cache/en/results/4942.html

    www.ti.com has several low noise wide bandwidth
    good linearity op-amps in small packages, some
    capable of single 3.3V supply operation, for well under
    $5 single quantity; digikey.com or mouser.com or other
    such electronic parts distributors will probably sell all
    the parts you need for a prototype in quantity one or more.
    Maxim, TI, et. al. typically also sell "evaluation boards"
    for their ADC and OP-AMP et. al. parts, they'll be physically
    larger than you need, but may be a convenience for
    quick "lab bench" experimentation before you build
    custom production PCBs that are of small size.
     
  5. Jun 12, 2007 #4
    look up on 'Lock-In Amplifier' or PSD. I myself am trying to measure really small signal, just integrate it over time
     
  6. Jun 12, 2007 #5

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I think these are the key points. To get a good SNR measurement, you need to limit the bandwidth of the measurement as much as possible, to eliminate noise that is not in the same frequency range as your signal. That may mean using a sharp BPF and lock-in amplifier for a narrow-band AC signal, or maybe a steep LPF for a DC signal, etc.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Re: Minimal Detectable Signal
  1. Infrared detection (Replies: 0)

  2. IR Detection (Replies: 8)

Loading...