Reaching all of R^N by rotations from a linear subspace

uekstrom
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a problem related to quantum mechanical description of vibrational motion in molecules. I would like, for efficiency, to integrate over symmetries (global rotations) of the molecule.

I would like to prove (or disprove) that all points in R^N can be reached by rotations from a linear subspace (let's call it L). In my particular case L has dimension N-3, and my rotations are generated by three matrices T_i, of the form

T_i = \mathrm{diag}(L_i,L_i,..),

where L_x,L_y,L_z are the 3x3 generators of SO(3). T_x is then a block-diagonal matrix with copies of L_x on the diagonal.

So what I want to prove (or disprove) is if, for a given x,

x = exp\left( c_x T_x + c_y T_y + c_z T_z \right) y

has a solution for x from R^N and y from the linear subspace L. L can be chosen arbitrarily, but should not depend on x. From numerical experiments is seems like this rotation is always possible, but I would like to have a formal proof. I will add more details if necessary.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ##v\in \mathbb{R}^N## be any given vector. Since ##L## is a linear subspace, there is an element in ##w\in L## with ##|v|=|w|##. Then there is always a rotation which transforms ##w## into ##v##. It can be solved in the two dimensional subspace spanned by ##v,w## and then extended in any way to ##\mathbb{R}^N##.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top