Reactance Equal: Can Low Value Capacitor Replace High Value Inductor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Thinker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the impedance equivalence between capacitors and inductors, specifically questioning whether a low-value capacitor can replace a high-value inductor due to their equal reactance at a specific frequency. While the mathematical relationship shows that the reactance can be equal, it is clarified that capacitors and inductors have fundamentally different behaviors in circuits, with capacitors exhibiting lagging current and inductors showing leading current. This difference in phase relationship means they cannot be simply interchanged despite having the same impedance. The confusion arises from the assumption that equal reactance implies identical circuit effects, which is not the case. Ultimately, the consensus is that capacitors and inductors cannot substitute for one another in practical applications.
The_Thinker
Messages
145
Reaction score
2
Now if we take the impedence for a circuit. Xc for the capacitive component and Xl for the inductive component and equate them, that is we equate the impedance then we can get the same impedance from both a capacitive as well as a inductive load, we get something like this.


Now, in mathematical form,

Xc = Xl

1/2(pi)fc = 2(pi)fl

so we can equate the capacitance and inductive impedances for a specific frequency.

Now my question is using this, can we state that a low value capacitor can be used instead of a high value inductor from this? since the impedence is the same?

I have heard that it is not possible, so I am just a bit confused, what exactly impedence.

I understand that a capacitor has lagging current and an inductor has leading current and all that and I understand that therefore they are not that simple to be interchanged.

But If the Independence are equal, then they must have the same effect on the circuit right? So, can't they be interchanged? That is my question.. Although I am a bit confused... :confused:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are mistaken: you cannot make the reactance of a capacitor the same as an inductor. The impedance of a capacitor is 1/(j*2 pi f * C), which means that its reactance is -1 / (2 pi f * C). A capacitor and an inductor will always have opposite signs.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top