Reaction forces in a two segment beam

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the calculation of reaction forces in a two-segment beam, specifically addressing the free body diagrams (FBDs) for segments AB and BC. Participants explore the implications of internal moments and forces at the supports, as well as the correct application of equilibrium equations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents their calculations for reaction forces at supports A, B, and C, noting confusion regarding the FBD for segment BC.
  • Another participant asserts that the FBD for segment BC is incorrect and emphasizes the need to include the internal moment at support B.
  • A subsequent reply reiterates the importance of including the internal moment in the FBD and suggests a simpler approach by taking the FBD just to the right of support B.
  • Participants discuss whether an internal moment should be included in the FBD and the implications of treating the connection at B as a pinned support.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the treatment of internal moments at support B. There is no consensus on the correct approach to the FBD for segment BC, as different interpretations of the internal forces and moments are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the calculations depend on the assumptions made about the support conditions and the presence of internal moments, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

yaro99
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


W6bzRhS.png


Homework Equations


∑Fx=0
∑Fy=0
∑M=0

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I am just concerned with part a.

I got the correct answers doing this:

First, FBD of segment AB:
D2AWbxD.png

+cw ∑M_A=0: -136 - 6*By = 0
By = -22.7N

two ways to get Ay:

one:
+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 6*Ay = 0
Ay = 22.7N

two:
∑Fy=0: -22.7 + Ay = 0
Ay = 22.7N

FDB entire beam:
Fbw3Iks.png

∑Fy=0: 22.7 - 22.7 + Cy = 0
Cy = 0

∑Fx=0: -440 + 220 + Cx = 0
Cx = 220N

Ok, so I got the correct answers. However, here is where I get confused. If I make a FBD on segment BC I get a different answer for Cy.

My attempt at a FBD:
hlxkOqq.png

this leads to either:
∑Fy=0: -22.7 + Cy = 0
Cy = 22.7N

or

+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 3*Cy = 0
Cy = 45.3N

Clearly my FBD is wrong for segment BC. I assume the correct FBD would have a zero reaction at point B; this would give the correct answer (0) for Cy. In order for Cy to be zero, there must be no forces or moment at point B in the FBD, but this doesn't make sense to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your free body diagram is wrong because when looking at that segment between the support at B and C , you must include the internal moment in the beam at B. Far simpler to take your FBD between the pin (just to the right of B ) and C. In this manner, the applied couple does not enter into your diagram.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Your free body diagram is wrong because when looking at that segment between the support at B and C , you must include the internal moment in the beam at B.

So my fbd is just missing an internal moment at B, and the resulting equation would be:
+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 3*Cy + M_B = 0
I can't solve directly for Cy since I don't have M_B.
Is this correct?

PhanthomJay said:
Far simpler to take your FBD between the pin (just to the right of B ) and C. In this manner, the applied couple does not enter into your diagram.
Would I not still have to include an internal moment? Wouldn't a complete diagram look something like this?
FYmQfRr.png
 
yaro99 said:
So my fbd is just missing an internal moment at B, and the resulting equation would be:
+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 3*Cy + M_B = 0
I can't solve directly for Cy since I don't have M_B.
Is this correct?
yes
Would I not still have to include an internal moment? Wouldn't a complete diagram look something like this?
FYmQfRr.png
unlike at an externally pinned support , there can be no internal moment in the beam at a pinned connection.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K