Reaction forces in a two segment beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating reaction forces in a two-segment beam using free body diagrams (FBDs). The correct calculations for forces at points A and B yield Ay = 22.7N and By = -22.7N, while the force at point C is determined to be zero. Confusion arises when attempting to analyze segment BC, where the user incorrectly includes an internal moment at point B in their FBD, leading to inconsistent results for Cy. Clarification is provided that at a pinned connection, there is no internal moment, simplifying the FBD and confirming that Cy should indeed be zero. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately representing forces and moments in FBDs for proper analysis.
yaro99
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


W6bzRhS.png


Homework Equations


∑Fx=0
∑Fy=0
∑M=0

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I am just concerned with part a.

I got the correct answers doing this:

First, FBD of segment AB:
D2AWbxD.png

+cw ∑M_A=0: -136 - 6*By = 0
By = -22.7N

two ways to get Ay:

one:
+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 6*Ay = 0
Ay = 22.7N

two:
∑Fy=0: -22.7 + Ay = 0
Ay = 22.7N

FDB entire beam:
Fbw3Iks.png

∑Fy=0: 22.7 - 22.7 + Cy = 0
Cy = 0

∑Fx=0: -440 + 220 + Cx = 0
Cx = 220N

Ok, so I got the correct answers. However, here is where I get confused. If I make a FBD on segment BC I get a different answer for Cy.

My attempt at a FBD:
hlxkOqq.png

this leads to either:
∑Fy=0: -22.7 + Cy = 0
Cy = 22.7N

or

+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 3*Cy = 0
Cy = 45.3N

Clearly my FBD is wrong for segment BC. I assume the correct FBD would have a zero reaction at point B; this would give the correct answer (0) for Cy. In order for Cy to be zero, there must be no forces or moment at point B in the FBD, but this doesn't make sense to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your free body diagram is wrong because when looking at that segment between the support at B and C , you must include the internal moment in the beam at B. Far simpler to take your FBD between the pin (just to the right of B ) and C. In this manner, the applied couple does not enter into your diagram.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Your free body diagram is wrong because when looking at that segment between the support at B and C , you must include the internal moment in the beam at B.

So my fbd is just missing an internal moment at B, and the resulting equation would be:
+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 3*Cy + M_B = 0
I can't solve directly for Cy since I don't have M_B.
Is this correct?

PhanthomJay said:
Far simpler to take your FBD between the pin (just to the right of B ) and C. In this manner, the applied couple does not enter into your diagram.
Would I not still have to include an internal moment? Wouldn't a complete diagram look something like this?
FYmQfRr.png
 
yaro99 said:
So my fbd is just missing an internal moment at B, and the resulting equation would be:
+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 3*Cy + M_B = 0
I can't solve directly for Cy since I don't have M_B.
Is this correct?
yes
Would I not still have to include an internal moment? Wouldn't a complete diagram look something like this?
FYmQfRr.png
unlike at an externally pinned support , there can be no internal moment in the beam at a pinned connection.
 
Back
Top