Reaction forces in a two segment beam

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating reaction forces in a two-segment beam using Free Body Diagrams (FBDs). The correct reaction forces at points A, B, and C were determined to be Ay = 22.7N, By = -22.7N, and Cy = 0N. The confusion arose when attempting to calculate Cy for segment BC, where the participant incorrectly included an internal moment at point B. The correct approach is to exclude the internal moment at a pinned connection, leading to a proper FBD that confirms Cy = 0N.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium equations: ∑Fx=0, ∑Fy=0, ∑M=0
  • Familiarity with Free Body Diagrams (FBDs)
  • Knowledge of reaction forces in beams
  • Concept of internal moments in structural analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in structural analysis
  • Learn how to construct accurate Free Body Diagrams for complex structures
  • Explore the concept of internal moments in beams and their implications
  • Review examples of reaction force calculations in multi-segment beams
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, structural analysts, and anyone involved in mechanics of materials or structural engineering who needs to understand reaction forces in beams.

yaro99
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


W6bzRhS.png


Homework Equations


∑Fx=0
∑Fy=0
∑M=0

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I am just concerned with part a.

I got the correct answers doing this:

First, FBD of segment AB:
D2AWbxD.png

+cw ∑M_A=0: -136 - 6*By = 0
By = -22.7N

two ways to get Ay:

one:
+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 6*Ay = 0
Ay = 22.7N

two:
∑Fy=0: -22.7 + Ay = 0
Ay = 22.7N

FDB entire beam:
Fbw3Iks.png

∑Fy=0: 22.7 - 22.7 + Cy = 0
Cy = 0

∑Fx=0: -440 + 220 + Cx = 0
Cx = 220N

Ok, so I got the correct answers. However, here is where I get confused. If I make a FBD on segment BC I get a different answer for Cy.

My attempt at a FBD:
hlxkOqq.png

this leads to either:
∑Fy=0: -22.7 + Cy = 0
Cy = 22.7N

or

+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 3*Cy = 0
Cy = 45.3N

Clearly my FBD is wrong for segment BC. I assume the correct FBD would have a zero reaction at point B; this would give the correct answer (0) for Cy. In order for Cy to be zero, there must be no forces or moment at point B in the FBD, but this doesn't make sense to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your free body diagram is wrong because when looking at that segment between the support at B and C , you must include the internal moment in the beam at B. Far simpler to take your FBD between the pin (just to the right of B ) and C. In this manner, the applied couple does not enter into your diagram.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Your free body diagram is wrong because when looking at that segment between the support at B and C , you must include the internal moment in the beam at B.

So my fbd is just missing an internal moment at B, and the resulting equation would be:
+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 3*Cy + M_B = 0
I can't solve directly for Cy since I don't have M_B.
Is this correct?

PhanthomJay said:
Far simpler to take your FBD between the pin (just to the right of B ) and C. In this manner, the applied couple does not enter into your diagram.
Would I not still have to include an internal moment? Wouldn't a complete diagram look something like this?
FYmQfRr.png
 
yaro99 said:
So my fbd is just missing an internal moment at B, and the resulting equation would be:
+cw ∑M_B=0: -136 + 3*Cy + M_B = 0
I can't solve directly for Cy since I don't have M_B.
Is this correct?
yes
Would I not still have to include an internal moment? Wouldn't a complete diagram look something like this?
FYmQfRr.png
unlike at an externally pinned support , there can be no internal moment in the beam at a pinned connection.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K