I Reaction Rate: Calculations & Limitations

Nguyen Ngoc Anh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

As we know, the reaction rate can be calculated as following:

R = N * σ * Φ (1)

Where R is reaction rate (events/s/cm3)
σ is cross section (cm2)
Φ is flux of incident particle beam (particles/s/cm2
N is density of target (atoms/cm3)

Logically, there is a limitation of R, because R cannot larger than the number of incident particles. But as equation (1), if Φ is constant, that means the number of incident particles is unchanged, and N increases, R will increase without any limitation. So if N is big enough, R will pass the limit that I talked above.

I hope that you can understand my idea well, because, my English is so bad.

Thank you very much,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you increase N too much, the incident particle beam won't penetrate the whole target, so you get regions with lower flux.
 
  • Like
Likes Nguyen Ngoc Anh
mfb said:
If you increase N too much, the incident particle beam won't penetrate the whole target, so you get regions with lower flux.
To expand on this, what you have given in post #1 is true only as long as the target can be considered thin. When this is no longer the case, you will get an exponential attenuation of the flux as it penetrates into the target material.
 
  • Like
Likes Nguyen Ngoc Anh
mfb said:
If you increase N too much, the incident particle beam won't penetrate the whole target, so you get regions with lower flux.
I thought about it. But we can think as following:

You have a target of mass m, therefore N atoms. You have I particles come to the target. In this case, R ~ I and N, so if you increase N, R increase, even if particle can not penetrate the whole target.
 
Orodruin said:
To expand on this, what you have given in post #1 is true only as long as the target can be considered thin. When this is no longer the case, you will get an exponential attenuation of the flux as it penetrates into the target material.
That's clever, could you please send me a reference with detailed formula?

I'm so sorry for my all stupid questions.

Thank you,
 
You have to look at a differential equation for the flux. Looking at a target with number density ##n## and cross section per target ##\sigma##, the probability of a given particle interacting in a thin layer of thickness ##dx## is given by ##p = \sigma n \, dx## and the change in the flux over the this distance is therefore
$$
d\Phi = - \Phi \sigma n \, dx \quad \Longrightarrow \quad \frac{d\Phi}{dx} = - n \sigma \Phi.
$$
Solving this differential equation for constant ##n## and ##\sigma## gives
$$
\Phi = \Phi_0 e^{-n\sigma x},
$$
where ##\Phi_0## is the flux at ##x = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes Nguyen Ngoc Anh
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top