MHB Reading Comprehensive - Transitivity Relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter highmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reading Relation
highmath
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Can one explain to me the sentence:
"Transitivity (or transitiveness) is a key property of both partial order relations and equivalence relations.".
...in simple words. The sentence is from Wikipedia at address:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive_relation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks pretty straight forward. The sentence is talking about two kinds of "relations", partial order relations, and equivalence relations. It is saying that the property of "transitivity" is a key property in each.

If your question is about the meanings of those words, a "relation", in mathematics, on sets is any set of "ordered pairs" of members of those sets. We can think of the fact that (a, b) is in that set as meaning that a and b are "related" in this way. In particular a relation is said to be an "order" relation if and only if, whenever (a, b) and (b, c) are pairs in the relation, so is (a, c).

A relation is an "equivalence" (we sometimes use the notation "a~b" to indicate that (a, b) is in the set of ordered pairs) relation if and only if it satisfies 3 conditions:
The "reflexive property": for any member, a, of the base set, we have a~ a (that the pair (a, a) is in the set of ordered pairs).
The "symmetric property": for any two members, a and b, of the base set we have that if a~b (that if (a, b)is in the set of ordered pairs) then b~ a (that (b, a) is in the set of ordered pairs.)
The "transitive property": For any three members, a, b, and c, of the base set we have that if a~b (that if (a, b) is in the set of ordered pairs) and if b~ c (if (b, c) is in the set of ordered pairs) then a~c (that (a, c) is in the set of ordered pairs.

In either case, the order relation or the equivalence relation, "transitivity" is an important property.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top